It is covered with valuable jewels, okay, I am not completely sure what the true answer is From, once again, Merlin The sword Excalibur's scabbard did not make the wearer invisible or make it impossible to lose blood, it might in other versions but I am going off what I know, Also merlin and arthur who wore the scabbard, it did not shine as bright as the sun, to be honest all I know from the version I know exaclibur is a sword that can kill any living thing because it was forged in a dragons breath, it is the sword that the sorcerer merlin placed in the Stone for arthur to find. Phew! Man I love that show....
Answer:
9th amendment says that all the rights not listed in the Constitution belong to the people, not the government. In other words, the rights of the people are not limited to just the rights listed in the Constitution.
10 amendment states that any power not specifically given to the federal government by the Constitution belongs to the States and the people.
Explanation:
The Tenth Amendment reserves the rights of the states, whereas the others only reserve the rights of the people. They protect rights not listed in the Constitution.
Fred Vinson died unexpectedly
Answer:
In my opinion, I would be for the U.S. expansion. With the expansion comes opportunities for new jobs, farming, new trading routes, and overall a chance at a new life. Although it is inaccurate to say that I would be in need of a job considering that I did not live at the same, I would assume that those in need of farm land and work would appreciate the movement. If I were a rich man living in the city during the time of expansion, I would still agree with the expansion. Because of the amount of people in search of a job in the city, the streets were crowded, work places were filled to the top, and people were desperate for work. The expansion allows for these people to move and find new work somewhere else that does not interfere with my work. However, we can not overlook the horrible things that came with this movement such as slavery, the deaths of many people, and the basic fact that it was unconstitutional. In perspective, this question could differ depending on the person. I would have been against the expansion if I were an Indian whose home was taken and whose family was being killed by the travelers.
Explanation:
i dont know if this is good i just wrote something do what you will with it
