1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natasha_Volkova [10]
3 years ago
9

How does Dr.King develop his claim that "one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws? Explain the evidence he provides

and evaluate how this evidence support his arguments
English
1 answer:
Ksivusya [100]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

He develops this claim by stating that if citizens are required to obey just laws, they have the full right and responsibility to disobey unjust laws and not allow them to move forward.

Explanation:

King says that the responsibility between obeying and disobeying laws is the same for all citizens who are subjected to them. This is because he affirms that, if everyone is obeyed to obey just laws that promote good things, everyone has the moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws, since they promote evil to society. To reinforce this argument, he shows how Saint Augustine and São Tomás de Aquino prove this idea, besides defining what makes a law fair or unjust.

You might be interested in
Nonsense=report<br>Correct=brainliest<br>Ang question: Crowbarries crowbarry crowbar​
fiasKO [112]

Answer:

what is thiis wheres your question?

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Newe extract 3
nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

The prejudice shown is making a sexist remark against the female gender.

The line "Women don't know the offside rule" shows how sexist the comment is.

Explanation:

A sexist remark is when a person of one gender says something discriminatory about a person of another gender. This means that talking bad about the other based on her gender is known or taken as a sexist comment or discrimination based on one's gender.

In the given scenario of the sports presenters, their comment about Sian Massey's 'incapability' to be a referee, based on her being a woman is a sexist remark. They are making the claim that Sian was not worthy to be a referee for the game because of her gender and that women don't know anything about <em>"offside rule"</em> which is discriminatory in nature.

This claim can be supported by the very comment <em>"Can you believe that? A female linesman. Women don't know the offside rule."</em>

3 0
3 years ago
during the feast, something strange happens when Harry and Snape see eachother. What is it? Why do you think this happens?​
monitta

Answer:

this happend  because professor snape was trying to read his mind(Legilimency) to

6 0
2 years ago
Rebuttal for going to collage? i’ll give brainliest
Elza [17]

Answer:

It can be really stressful to have to defend your decision about college, especially when everyone is going to be asking you about it as you go through your senior year.

✌ (☞゚ヮ゚)☞ ☜(゚ヮ゚☜)

Explanation:✿◕ ‿ ◕✿

7 0
3 years ago
When is a creative work considered to be copyrighted?
romanna [79]
When it is published on the open market
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Peter didn't know ___ was his.<br> whichever<br> which<br> whomever<br> who
    9·2 answers
  • Please help ASAP<br> CASC
    7·1 answer
  • Englosh ethos, pathis and logos worksheet
    6·1 answer
  • What can you predict about the ants based on the behavior of the animals
    7·1 answer
  • What’s the answer I’m offering 63 points
    13·1 answer
  • What is average Kinetic energy? <br> force <br> cold <br> heat<br> temperature
    8·1 answer
  • A B C order for fall
    12·1 answer
  • Przedstaw trzy sytuacje, dzięki którym główna bohaterka powieści zasłużyła na miano kłamczuchy.
    7·1 answer
  • Guys please help , can you help me :)? ( NO LINK PLEASE )
    8·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. Which statement describes an example of logical evidence? A. a speaker's story about a personal exper
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!