There are other options in the case when defendant admits to the crime (of killing the victim)
Explanation:
In case the defendant accepts to have committed the crime of killing the victim, he can be given a thought of receiving some leniency in the punishment.
The counsel of the concerned defendant can argue in the court of law, that act was in a fit of rage, or haste of anger and was entirely not pre-meditated. He can further arague that feeling guilt of the crime, the defendant admitted to his crime hence he should be subjected to a lenient term.
Answer:
To steer the car in reverse, turn the wheel in the direction you want the rear of the car to go. Turning the wheel to the right steers the back of the car to the right. Turning the wheel to the left steers to the left.
Explanation:
Answer:
in both cases the flyer was presented to the barber before the service was provided.
a) no, because Karl was informed about the mistake and the real price and could then still have decided to take his business elsewhere. but if he then agreed to still have the service performed under the now updated conditions, then that is what the "contract" is basing on.
he has no grounds to claim the other price afterwards.
b) no, because the service provider saw the flyer information, did not object to or correct the information right away, but performed the service instead. now the "contract" is based on that agreement based on the conditions of the flyer.
Answer: The driver on the left must yield to the driver on the right
