Answer:
Archaeology
Explanation:
Archaeology is the study of the remains of the past and also the physical features of the environment. Therefore the answer is archaeology :)
Answer:
When studied carefully, the similar vegetation zones are mirrored in terms of their geographical occurrence, when considering the equator as the divisor.
Explanation:
The location where similar vegetation zones occur are almost mirrored, when the equator is considered as the divisor. Excluding the extreme desert regions of the northern parts of Africa, the grasslands and rain forests occur in similar locations above and below the equator.
This can be explained due to the fact that there are similar climatic conditions in such regions, due to their similar distance from the equator.
<em>This can better be understood by studying the vegetation patterns from the edited map extract below </em>
In telling the history of the United States and also of the nations of the Western Hemisphere in general, historians have wrestled with the problem of what to call the hemisphere's first inhabitants. Under the mistaken impression he had reached the “Indies,” explorer Christopher Columbus called the people he met “Indians.” This was an error in identification that has persisted for more than five hundred years, for the inhabitants of North and South America had no collective name by which they called themselves.
Historians, anthropologists, and political activists have offered various names, none fully satisfactory. Anthropologists have used “aborigine,” but the term suggests a primitive level of existence inconsistent with the cultural level of many tribes. Another term, “Amerindian,” which combines Columbus's error with the name of another Italian explorer, Amerigo Vespucci (whose name was the source of “America”), lacks any historical context. Since the 1960s, “Native American” has come into popular favor, though some activists prefer “American Indian.” In the absence of a truly representative term, descriptive references such as “native peoples” or “indigenous peoples,” though vague, avoid European influence. In recent years, some argument has developed over whether to refer to tribes in the singular or plural—Apache or Apaches—with supporters on both sides demanding political correctness.
A a <span>Union victory would prove that a democratic nation dedicated to the idea of equality could survive.</span>
