1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Damm [24]
2 years ago
6

What function is the inverse of the exponential function y = (1.5)x?

Mathematics
1 answer:
vagabundo [1.1K]2 years ago
6 0

Correct question is;

What function is the inverse of the exponential function y = 1.5^(x)?

Answer:

y = log_1.5_x

Step-by-step explanation:

The inverse of exponential functions is usually written in form of logarithm.

For example inverse of y = p^(x) will be written as; y = log_p_(x)

Similarly applying this same pattern to our exponential function y = 1.5^(x), we have the inverse as;

y = log_1.5_x

You might be interested in
I’m not understanding what to do here
AVprozaik [17]

Answer:

27/50 is the answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
A 2-column table with 9 rows titled December Temperatures. Column 1 is labeled Day with entries 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Colum
SSSSS [86.1K]

Answer:

variability and stay the same

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
its question #2 my son and I cannot figure out how to do this other than dividing. however, when u divide 59 into 422, are you s
anyanavicka [17]
Honestly I can see an argument for 7 shelves or for 8 shelves. 

When you do the calculation; \frac{422}{59}=7.15 You get 7.15 shelves. Clearly you cannot have .15 of a shelf so the logician in me wants to say you need 8 shelves! 

But if the assignment is aimed estimation skills, (Which is what I assume is being implied by the title of the assignment), then the easier calculation of \frac{420}{60}=7 is probably what the teacher was hoping for.

You might have been accidentally been calculating \frac{59}{422} =.139. Remember division is NOT communitive! i.e.1\div2\neq2\div1.

From the image;
The first step was to see that 59 can not go into 4..resulting in the zero above the 4, multiplying 0 by 59 and subtracting 0 from 4. 

The second step begins by bringing down the 2, seeing that 59 can not go into 42..resulting in the zero above the 2, multiplying 0 by 59 and subtracting 0 from 42.

The third step begins by bringing down the 2, seeing that 59 can go into 422 7 times (I tested this on the right by a short multiplication problem)..resulting in the 7 above the 2, multiplying 7 by 59 and subtracting 413 from 42.

This process continues....

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Without multiplying determine the sign of the product (-468,256)(183,758).​
maxonik [38]

Answer:

negative

Step-by-step explanation:

rules:

+ + = +

- - = +

+ - = -

- + = -    ----> (-468,256)(183,758)

3 0
2 years ago
A polynomial divided by a polynomial is a polynomial. always, sometimes, or never true?
Artemon [7]
I think it is always true. I am not sure but I hope I'm right
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Plz Answer fast, thanks
    15·1 answer
  • Anna weighs 52 pounds. Patrick weighs x pounds. Write an expression for their combined weight.
    5·1 answer
  • approximately 3 people out of every 25 are left handed about how many people would you expect in a group of 140 people
    5·1 answer
  • MAY SOMEBODY HELP ME THANKS!
    9·2 answers
  • Simplify: ? (10x = 105 - (12x – 247)​
    15·1 answer
  • Write 14 hundred thousands, 19 ten thousands, 17 thousands, 7 hundreds 15 ones
    8·1 answer
  • Jocelyn's swimming pool is 14.75ft long by 7.5 ft wide. The community center swimming pool is 200 square feet larger than Jocely
    5·1 answer
  • Please help with this, i tried to solve for x, and it didnt give me any of those answers
    14·1 answer
  • Solve the inequality 5x &lt; 16 +x.<br> x &lt; 1/4<br> x&gt;1/4<br> x&lt;4<br> x&gt;4
    5·2 answers
  • 1 32 multiplied by 0.32 when rounded to the nearest hundredths
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!