All categories

3 years ago

What is this please please please

Mathematics

1 answer:

Snowcat [4.5K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

first graph the points, then count the boxes

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Give the domain and range of the function. Tell whether the relation is a function.

ra1l [238]

The domain is [0,4], as the x-values go from 0 to 4.

The range is [0,4], as the y-values span from 0 to 4.

The relation is a function

- For a relation to be a function, each x-value can have only one, distinct y-value. This is the case for this relation, as each x-input has only one corresponding y output.

3 0

3 years ago

Look at the sequence in the table.

malfutka [58]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The consecutive values of $a_{n}$ have a common difference d, that is

d = 8 - 3 = 13 - 8 = 18 - 13 = 23 - 18 = 5

This indicates that the sequence is arithmetic.

The recursive formula allows the next term in the sequence to be found from the previous term by adding 5, thus

$a_{n}$ = $a_{n-1}$ + 5 → A

7 0

3 years ago

The least total cost method (LTC) lot-sizing technique calculates the order quantity by comparing the carrying cost and the setu

rewona [7]

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

The least total cost method is the method in which the total cost of the ordering cost and the total carrying cost is equal among various lot size available.

The order quantity should be choose when the total ordering cost and the total carrying cost equal to each other

The formula to compute the economic order quantity is shown below:

a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:

$= \sqrt{\frac{2\times \text{Annual demand}\times \text{Ordering cost}}{\text{Carrying cost}}}$

It is always be expressed in units

The formula to compute the ordering cost is

$= \frac{Annual\ demand}{Economic\ order\ quantity}\times ordering\ cost\ per\ order$

And, the formula to compute the carrying cost is

$= \frac{Economic\ order\ quanity}{2}\times carrying\ cost\ per\ unit$

Hence, the given statement is true

8 0

4 years ago

State who is correct and explain why

Ivan

Answer:

12.4+3√7 is irrational

Step-by-step explanation:

12.4 is a rational number

3√7 is an irrational number

<u>The sum of a rational number and an irrational number is irrational.</u>

So, 12.4+3√7 is irrational

4 0

4 years ago

The nine cats in a pet store were weighed. Their weights (in pounds) are given below.

stepladder [879]

Range is 6 and the mode is 8

6 0

3 years ago