Not sure what the options for the answer are (if there are any), but an appropriate entry in this box is "common goals," among other answers. Please let me know if you have any questions and provide me with the answer options if there are any.
Answer:
Answer for the question:
Fund ABC charges a 12b-1 fee of 1.10% and maintains an expense ratio of .85%. Fund XYZ charges a front-end load of 3% but has no 12b-1 fee and an expense ratio of .15%. Assume the rate of return on both funds’ portfolios (before any fees) is 6% per year. Suppose you invest $1000 in each fund. Compute the value of the investments after the end of year 1, year 3, and year 10.
is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is negligent hiring .
Explanation:
Negligent claim can be defined as a legal claim made by an individual ( who can be an employee or customer ) against the employer, because the individual has been injured by the employee who has a history of doing such incidents with others. This hiring claim ( negligent ) argues that the employer should have know about the history of such employees who are threat to other employees and customers.
Answer:
cash 1,000 debit
inventory 2,000 debit
land 5,000 debit
note payable 3,000 credit
Krug capital Account 5,000 credit
Explanation:
The land and inventories will be accepted at his market value.
Along with cash this are assets which enter the partnership so they are debited.
The note payable decreases the Krug capital contribution. It is credited.
Krug capital account balance will be to complete the entry and make debit = credit.
Answer:
1. False
The higher the figure, the higher the risk. Kindly note that loans are usually insured against default. The higher the amount insured, the higher the premium payable as insurance on such amounts.
2. False
It does not make for good internal control to have one person regardless of their position to have the final say on loans of great magnitude such as $5 Million. This can quickly degenerate into a situation where the officer involved is tempted to abuse that power. It makes for good corporate governance and risk management to ensure that the board is responsible for loans of such magnitude.
3. True
If a bank lost $100 in a thousand places, from loan default, that translates to a loss of $100,000. This relatively is large however it is small and will have less impact that a loss of a million dollars in 3 places. That's $ 3,000,000.
As already indicated, it makes for good loan disbursement governance, to ensure that there is at least two persons involved in the risk acceptance criteria (RAC) evaluation and loan disbursement process.
4. False
Separation of duties is the foundation of good internal control. It allows for greater objectivity. It is also key to carefully select signatories to loan disbursements. They have to be people of impeccable character and the company must exercise proper risk management to ensure that every protocol such as opportunity that may create the impulse or inclination to breach policy is removed completely.
Cheers!
