Tyson's effect on Esteban and his life could be best described by ethos.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Ethos is a word that best describes the guiding beliefs or ideals that characterize a community, nation, or ideology. A man's character or personality can be explained by ethos; it also explains the balance between passion and caution.
Aristotle is a Greek philosopher, he coined the word “Ethos”.
Esteban responds that Neil deGrasse Tyson is his hero and he wants to give back to his own culture through spreading scientific knowledge, just like Tyson did. In the above statement, ethos best describes the Tyson's effect on Esteban and his life.
It granted religious freedom to all who professed a belief in Jesus Christ.
Toleration Act was enacted in Passed in Maryland, it promised toleration to all Christians but declared the death penalty for those, like Jews and atheists, who rejected the holiness of Jesus Christ. Toleration Act also assured that Maryland could able to attract Catholic migrants during the colonial period.
However, it was also an to attempt to overcome struggles among the two religious groups. The Toleration Act of 1649 made it a felony to restrict the spiritual rights of Christians. It also became the first Law who promotes religious tolerance enacted in the English colonies.
Answer:
<u>D. Americans are less likely to identify themselves as group members today than in the past.</u>
Explanation:
Recently Americans do not difine themselves or identify themselves as a group members. In other times belonging to a certain gruop was part of a very importan aspect of americans. Americans identites can be based on another facts, maybe more individialistc aspects than actually belonging to a certain social group.
<u>Answer</u>:
C) Taney can not deny Scott citizenship because it is federal right.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The counterclaim is the opposite view of the claim statement. The counterclaim showing the strong viewpoint of your research that you have done thorough research and even considered the other's viewpoint also. With the supporting evidence, the researcher can use the counterclaim supporting evidence. The claim never goes unsupported. The credible source could be the newspaper, websites, encyclopedia, and many more resources are there to support the claim.
Kant believed in something he called the <em>categorical imperative. </em>A categorical imperative is a particular moral position that holds in all possible situations - an unshakable moral law, in other words. For imperatives like "do not kill," this seems reasonable, but for others, such as "do not lie," it gets a little hairier.
Imagine a scenario where a murderer comes to your door and asks if you've see your friend around. Moments before, your friend came to you telling you about the murderer, asking if they could hide at your house. Kant would say you're obligated not to lie, so your options are to either shut the door on the murderer (not a great idea) or give away your friend's hiding place (an even worse idea). You can see how a little white lie wouldn't hurt, and would in fact <em>prevent harm from happening</em>. If you were a sworn Kantian, it might play out badly for everyone involved.
To answer your question in light of that, Kantian ethics hold that certain moral standards are universal and impose a duty on <em>all </em>humans. Do not lie. Period.
