This person led so many slaves to freedom, he or she was sometimes called by the nickname Moses

Suppose the MPC of a country is 0.72 and the government reduces taxes by $20 billion to stimulate the economy. How much of the t

blsea [12.9K]

I think the answer is A or C
have a great day!!!

7 0

3 years ago

If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," how does he still justify civil disobedienc

iren2701 [21]

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.

3 0

3 years ago

Canada's literacy rate is over 99%. Because of this, you could expect that........

cestrela7 [59]

It would probably bee B

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

At the end of Jefferson's second term it seems that the political situation should have made Jefferson's party very vulnerable i

Elena L [17]

Answer:

The answer is: It helped: That the Federalist Party was weakening, and was practically the only one of the opposition. While Jefferson's popularity had the majority of his support among southern planters and poor farmers in the south and west; however, he also found a good electoral fishing ground between grain growers in New England and the mid-Atlantic states.

Explanation:

The fact was labeled "Revolution" at the time, which meant a break with the previous political order as it initiated the first bipartisan system in the United States; That is why it is known as the "Revolution of 1800". Upon taking office in March 1801 Jefferson became the third president of the United States; starting the long period of predominance of the Democratic-Republican Party.

Jefferson would be reelected in 1804 for a second term that began in 1805; In 1808 the Democratic-Republican candidate James Madison was elected President, who at that time was Jefferson's Secretary of State.

The Democratic-Republican Party, like all parties of the time, was dominated by a select elite of leaders; the consultation to the bases of the party by means of internal primary elections was an idea absolutely unknown then. The election of the presidential candidate of the party was made by the Democratic-Republican Caucus in Congress.

But from the election of Madison a kind of unwritten rule or custom was imposed that the candidate should be the Secretary of State of the outgoing Government; in this way the congressmen elected Madison, Jefferson's Secretary of State.

As a result, when a Democratic-Republican president appointed his Secretary of State, he was also naming the future presidential candidate of his party; and since the victory was almost assured, he was actually naming his presidential successor.

The ease with which the Democratic-Republican Party won the elections was due to the growing weakness of the Federalist Party, which was practically the only one of the opposition.

The Democratic-Republican Party had the majority of its support among southern planters and poor farmers in the south and west; nevertheless, he also found a good electoral fishing ground between the grain growers of New England and the Mid-Atlantic States, "being the New York-Virginia axis that sustained the victory of the Republican Party in 1800."

The answer is: It helped: That the Federalist Party was weakening, and was practically the only one of the opposition. While Jefferson's popularity had the majority of his support among southern planters and poor farmers in the south and west; however, he also found a good electoral fishing ground between grain growers in New England and the mid-Atlantic states.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the best reason that the title of an article published on a website might not help to determine if the information is re

nordsb [41]

Because the title does not show a lot about the article except what it's about. You may be able to tell by the author because the author may have written reliable or unreliable information before.

7 0

3 years ago