Answer:
Yes, they are equalent
Step-by-step explanation:
12:14 = 6:7
60:70 =6:7
both can be simplified to 6:7
The answer is 218 and 219 assuming I understood the question correctly :)
The fourth or the D) Option is correct.
To find the new induced matrix via a scalar quantified multiplication we have to multiply the scalar quantity with each element surrounded and provided in a composed (In this case) 3×3 or three times three matrix comprising 3 columns and 3 rows for each element which is having a valued numerical in each and every position.
Multiply the scalar quantity with each element with respect to its row and column positioning that is,
Row × Column. So;
(1 × 1) × 7, (2 × 1) × 7, (3 × 1) × 7, (1 × 2) × 7, (2 × 2) × 7, (3 × 2) × 7, (1 × 3) × 7, (2 × 3) × 7 and (3 × 3) × 7. This will provide the final answer, that is, the D) Option.
To interpret and make it more interesting in LaTeX form. Here is the solution with LaTeX induced matrix.




Hope it helps.
Answer:
5, 11
Step-by-step explanation:
the number is subtracting 4 adding 6 subtracting 4 adding 6
The answer is C: (-3,-1)
To test if points satisfy an equation, all you need to do is test the numbers in both of the equations it provides you
Here is proof the answer is C :
<em>y > x - 2 </em>
(lets plug in point C)
-1 > -3 - 2
<u>solve </u>
-1 > -5 <em>?</em>
<em>Yes</em> this statement is true- onto the next inequalitity!
<em>y > 2x + 2 </em>
-1 > 2(-3) + 2
<u>solve </u>
-1 > -6 + 2
-1 > -4<em> ? </em>
<em>Yes, </em>this inequality is true too!
Know we know answer c (-3,-1) is the right answer!