Answer:
119 R5
divide divide divide divide
Answer:
No, because the reflection of ABC is not congruent to A’B’C’.
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The rule of the reflection across the line y=x is equal to
(x,y) -------> (y,x)
so
A(-6,6) -------> A'(6,-6) ----> is ok
B(-3,3) ------> B'(3,-3) ----> is ok
C(-8,2) ------> C'(8,-2) ----> is not ok ( is not a reflection acros the line y=x)
therefore
The triangles are no t congruent, because the reflection of ABC is not congruent to A’B’C’
Substitute this into the parabolic equation,
We're told the line 
intersects 
twice, which means the quadratic above has two distinct real solutions. Its discriminant must then be positive, so we know
We can tell from the quadratic equation that has its vertex at the point (3, 6). Also, note that
and
so the furthest to the right that extends is the point (5, 2). The line passes through this point for 
. For any value of 
, the line passes through either only once, or not at all.
So 
; in set notation,
Answer:
(18, ∞)
Step-by-step explanation:
(18, ∞) is the only option that works. if we ignore the "greater than" sign, and just set the function equal to -12, we see that x-10=-12 would give us x=-2. If we plug in -3 for x, we get -13, which is less than -12. if we plug in -1 for x, we get -11, which is greater than -12. Therefore, with the function only having one critical point (zero), we know that every value greater than -2 is a solution. Technically, the full solution would be (-2, ∞). however, the only answer available meeting the criteria would be (18, ∞).
Answer:
6 < x < 8
Step-by-step explanation:
The compound inequality in this instance represent the "and" condition, not the "or" condition.* We might solve it like this.
-47 > 1 -8x > -63 . . . . given
Multiply by -1:
47 < -1 +8x < 63
Add 1:
48 < 8x < 64
Divide by 8:
6 < x < 8
______
* You can tell this is the case by looking at the ends of the given statement:
-47 > -63 . . . . a true statement, so the solution set will be an intersection, not a union.
