Answer:
A limited war is one in which the belligerents do not expend all of the resources at their disposal, whether human, industrial, agricultural, military, natural, technological, or otherwise in a specific conflict. Limited war is the opposite concept to total war.
Explanation:
The Extent of Battle from 1861 to 1865. Did the North win by waging total war in the Civil War? Total war is a “war that is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded.”
I think the appropriate response is no. It was misguided and shortsighted.Both Britain and France were less needy financially on exchange with the US than Jefferson envisioned, however then financial matters never was his solid suit.
The War of 1812 was more to do with the possibility that Britain, its assets secured in the long haul battle against Napoleon, would be not able make any successful guard of Canada which could in this manner effectively be conquered.However, Britain had since a long time ago settled maritime amazingness over France and was along these lines ready to utilize its naval force to disable the US economy and power Madison into an arranged peace.
Russia (USSR)
I'm pretty sure East or West Germany? Google it.
