1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slamgirl [31]
3 years ago
8

What makes a source credible?

History
2 answers:
KatRina [158]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A. It lacks evidence to support its arguments

Explanation:

credible source can change depending on the discipline, but in general, for academic writing, a credible source is one that is unbiased and is backed up with evidence. ... Is the source in-depth (more than a page or two), with an abstract, a reference list, and documented research or data

Sonbull [250]3 years ago
5 0
I think the answer is B :))
You might be interested in
Question #4: Those who strongly opposed the war and believed the U.S. should withdraw their troops from
Aliun [14]

Answer:

Filipenes, and American Air forces

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What is the 14th amendment?<br><br>​
kari74 [83]

Answer:

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified and granted citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was a reason that the US Senate refused to let the United States join the League of Nations?
lianna [129]
The United States did not sign the Treaty of Versailles because two groups of U.S. senators opposed some of the treaty's conditions and prevented the Senate from acquiring the two-thirds majority vote needed for its passage. One of their main objections was that the treaty compromised U.S. autonomy.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What 2 arguments did some leaders present for developing in the south​
Svetlanka [38]

These leaders argued that by remaining committed to cotton production, the south was becoming dependent on the north for manufactured goods. These southerners also argued that factories and workshops would revive the economy of the Upper South, which was less prosperous than the cotton states.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ME, I’ll give brainlest
love history [14]
The divine rights of kings was invented by King James 1st. The divine rights of the king was used to give all the power to the king & taking power away from that of the pope. It meant that the king was given their authority under God. Pros of this would be many found after the Enlightenment. The Enlightment brought forth much attention to that of Torture. Queen Maria Teresa, she was an absolute monarch who improved the lives of farmers but this tactic was only used to take away power from that of the Nobles. One bad example would be Ferdinand the 2nd, he created the Edict of Restitution which is a document that returns any German Lutheran to that of Catholicism. This rule had much benefit but it still gave too much power to the monarch and absolutely no power to the people. During this time many monarchs like usually lived on a high Pedestal while their people were living with famine and poverty
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How much colonial opposition was there to British rule by 1776? (fraction/percentages...etc.)
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Referencing the map of India, please state the neighboring countries with whom India shares its borders. Are there any natura
    14·1 answer
  • What was the name given to the flowering African American culture, art, writing, and music in the late 1920?
    5·1 answer
  • How might modern developments have changed trade routes through arabia since the 500's?
    8·1 answer
  • Now that you've read the poem, which statement
    13·2 answers
  • How did the supreme court cases help end segregation? did it truly end segregation?
    7·2 answers
  • In what ways did laws discriminate against immigrants?
    9·1 answer
  • Why do armies take prisoners?
    7·1 answer
  • Yo, i could use some help, lol. uh, right answers would be apppretiated.
    13·2 answers
  • The Supreme Court ruled in the Northern Securities Trust case that the monopoly was illegal and the trust should be broken up. m
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!