1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
luda_lava [24]
2 years ago
8

Last question for today:

Mathematics
1 answer:
Delvig [45]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The answer is 1 11/12

Step-by-step explanation:

First you could convert both of them to improper fractions, then you could get them to a common denominator and the least common denominator for these two fractions would be 12 so you would multiply the fraction 10 2/3 so that they both have the same denominator then you would subtract them then you would make the answer a proper fraction again so your answer would be 1 11/12

10 2/3 = 32/3 times 4 = 128/12

8 9/12 = 105/12

128/12 - 105/12 = 23/12 = 1 11/12

You might be interested in
La siguiente tabla presenta las frecuencias absolutas y relativas de las distintas caras de un dado cuando se simulan 300 lanzam
noname [10]

La opinión correcta es la de Camila que argumenta que la frecuencia relativa de la cara con el #6 será un valor cercano a 0,166.

<h3>Qué es la frecuencia relativa?</h3>

La frecuencia relativa es un término matemático que se utiliza en la estadística para referirse al número de veces que un evento se repite durante un experimento.

Por otra parte, es necesario aclara que la frecuencia relativa no se modifica en gran medida si se aumenta el número de veces de una prueba, debido a que la probabilidad de ocurrencia de este evento va a ser la misma.

De acuerdo a lo anterior, Camila tiene razón debido a que considera que el valor de la frecuencia relativa no se modifica en gran medida entre 300 o 600 lanzamientos de los dados.

Nota: Esta pregunta está incompleta porque no está la tabla. No obstante, la puedo responder basado en mi conocimiento previo.

Aprenda más sobre probabilidad en: brainly.com/question/16019390

6 0
2 years ago
HELP ME PLEASEEE!! <br><br><br><br><br><br> 48 degrees 96 degrees x =
Roman55 [17]

Answer:

144°

96+48(further away angles)

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I really need help if you explain I will give brainliest
Troyanec [42]
Since the ratio of sides is 4 to 3, the proportion is:

\frac{4}{3} = \frac{12}{x}

x = 9
6 0
3 years ago
Clarinex is a drug used to treat asthma. In clinical tests of this drug, 1655 patients were treated with 5- mg doses of Clarinex
bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.021 -0.012}{\sqrt{\frac{0.012(1-0.012)}{1655}}}=3.363  

p_v =P(z>3.363)=0.00039  

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.01 we have p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of interest is significantly higher than 0.012 (1.2%)

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=1655 represent the random sample taken

\hat p=0.021 estimated proportion of interest

p_o=0.012 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.01 represent the significance level

Confidence=99% or 0.99

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that true proportions is higher than 0.012.:  

Null hypothesis:p \leq 0.012  

Alternative hypothesis:p > 0.012  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.021 -0.012}{\sqrt{\frac{0.012(1-0.012)}{1655}}}=3.363  

Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.01. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(z>3.363)=0.00039  

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.01 we have p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 1% of significance the proportion of interest is significantly higher than 0.012 (1.2%)

3 0
3 years ago
Write an equation in​ the slope-intercept form of the line.
nata0808 [166]
Answer: Y= 1/-2x + 2
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Another problem I’m struggling with
    13·2 answers
  • After 3\4 of a minute a sloth has moved just 3\8 of a foot.what is the sloth's speed in feet per minute?
    13·1 answer
  • I need help asap please
    12·1 answer
  • Which equation can be represented using the number line?​
    8·2 answers
  • Nancy had $2,848.52 in a savings account with simple interest. She had opened the account with $2,006 exactly 3 years earlier. W
    9·1 answer
  • An angle measures 73.6° less than the measure of its supplementary angle. What is the measure of each angle?
    6·1 answer
  • An albatross is a large bird that can fly 400 kilometers in 8 hours at a constant speed. What are two constants of proportionali
    8·1 answer
  • Find x pleaseeeeeeeeee
    13·1 answer
  • I need help on number 19 and 20
    10·2 answers
  • Pls help!!
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!