Answer:
0.32608696
Step-by-step explanation:
8 because a square is all the same size so ad up 2+2+2+2 it = 8
No, it is not equivalent to (x5)3. If yoh were to put 1 as a substitute for x5; 1 × 1× 1 equals 1, as represented in x5x5x5. The thing is (1)3 equals 3, as shown in (x5)3. You can substitute x5 for any number. x5x5x5 is more like it is raised to the third power than multiplied by 3.
Hope this helps!!!
Let us assume the first number = x
Then the second number = 5x -2
The third number = x + 4
The total number that needs to be divided into three parts is 219
Then we can write the equation as
x + 5x - 2 + x + 4 = 219
7x + 2 = 219
7x = 219 - 2
7x = 217
x = 217/7
= 31
Then
First number = 31
Second number = 5x - 2
= (5 * 31) - 2
= 155 -2
= 153
Third number = x + 4
= 31 + 4
= 35
So the three numbers are 31, 153 and 35.
Answer:
24
Step-by-step explanation:
From the picture you can see that area is sume of area P1 and area P2.
a=6 because its egdes are on point -2 and 4, so it is 6. (See x-ose)
h=3 Edges on -2 and 1 (see y-ose)
k=2 edges on 3 and 1 on y-ose
P1=a*h=6*3=18
P2=a*k/2=6*2/2=6
P=18+6=24
