Answer:
Explanation:
According to Wikipedia, ***"The rule of four is not required by the Constitution, any law, or even the Supreme Court's own published rules. Rather, it is a custom that has been observed since the Court was given discretion over which appeals to hear by the Judiciary Act of 1891It is a working rule devised by the Court as a practical mode of determining that a case is deserving of review, the theory being that if four Justices find that a legal question of general importance is raised, that is ample proof that the question has such importance. This is a fair enough rule of thumb on the assumption that four Justices find such importance on an individualized screening of the cases sought to be reviewed."***
Rhis modus operandi helps to streamline the quality and amount of appeal that is granted Certiorari by ensuring that only very important question is given consideration.
This would hence discard those questions, scenarios or appeals that does not win the vote of the four justices.
Hence it is a not so favorable procedure to the minority masses holding a claim that seems trivial in the surface.
But this procedure should remain.
And also, camera's should not be prohibited in the court room. This helps to test for objectivity.
Consumer behavior is influenced by advertising/news, with both of these influences persuading consumers to buy a product or making the product appear to be more than it actually is, even leaving the consumer to feel they missed out if they don't go out and buy this new awesome product.
Two examples: a Wendy's( or any fast food advertisement) ad advertises the new 4 for 4, the consumer can get a burger, fries, chicken nuggets, and drink for only $4. Who wouldn't purchase this cheap, mouth watering deal?
Another example would be: A makeup advertisement or even hair products appeal to women consumers, the advertisement encourages the women to go buy this new product because their has never been anyother like it. This new beauty product can work miracles!!
Answer:
code of conduct
Explanation:
Its clearly the supervisor is disappointed and may have the right due to lack of effort by Leticia. Regardless of any situation as a supervisor, you must follow all terms of the code of conduct in a professional manner. Which depending on employer, usually consists of:
Personal behavior
integrity and values
compliance
respect for others
professionalism
These are just a few that are important to know and understand on both sides of employer, management and employees. By shouting out across office, where perhaps other fellow co-workers are present, violates most of these. Any disciplinary action should be in private with supervisor and employee and remain confidential with a written statement signed by both supervisor and employee with a witness present during this private meeting.
A nation's competitiveness depends on the capacity of its industries to <u>innovate and upgrade</u> and thereby maintain its competitive advantage.
<h3>
What is competitive advantage?</h3>
- A company's ability to produce goods or services faster, more efficiently, or for less money than its competitors is known as a ccompetitive advantage.
- These elements enable the producing unit to outperform its competitors in terms of sales or margins. Cost structure, branding, the standard of the product offers, the distribution system, intellectual property, and customer service are just a few examples of the variables that are thought to contribute to competitive advantages.
- Comparative and differentiated advantages are two types of competitive advantages.
- A corporation has a comparative advantage if it can create a product more effectively than a competitor, which increases profit margins.
- When a company's products are regarded as both distinctive and of greater quality than those of a competitor, this is known as having a differential advantage.
To learn more about competitive advantage with the given link
brainly.com/question/15095207
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Acquiantance is the one at fault in the issue not the attorney in the deceased case(estate)
Explanation: The attorney advised the acquaintance that the attorney did not have experience and was too busy to do the work necessary to become competent. The attorney offered to refer acquaintance to another lawyer who regularly practiced in the field and advised the acquaintance that he should see another lawyer promptly because there might be deadlines he should follow as the executor. The acquaintance did not contact another lawyer until eight months after meeting with the attorney. So the attorney is not subject to any civil liability.
