Answer:
Major General Andrew Jackson fought the Battle of New Orleans for a number of reasons. First is that neither the British not Jackson and his men had heard that the two warring sides had already signed a treaty to end the hostilities in Ghent, Belgium on December 24th, 1814. Also, Jackson had been a prisoner of the British during the American Revolution and he was said to still hold a lot of personal animosity towards them for that reason.
Explanation:
Jackson had declared martial law in New Orleans and called on anyone and everyone to try to defend the city from the British incursion. Skirmishes began on Dec 23rd, 1814 and culminated in the Battle of New Orleans on the 8th of January, 1815. The American group of militia fighters and whomever else was prepared to defend the city were able to outwit the British who suffered many casualties despite the upper hand they had in terms of tactics and equipment.
Answer:
Economic life
Explanation:
Economic life is the term given to the period during which a structure is expected to remain useful in its original use.
It means the personal freedom to follow whatever religion you choose, or
NO religion if that's your choice, in any way you want as long as you don't
bother other people, without any interference from laws or other people,
and without any penalty or discrimination no matter what your choice is.
That seems like such common sense that it's hard to understand that
in huge parts of the world, that's not the way it is at all.
Answer: It's true, this is an example of consumer misbehavior, however there are some factors to consider.
Explanation: Although it is pretty evident that Michelle bought the dress in the first place because she liked it, what was done afterwards can be labeled as misbehavior for her plan to have the money back despite the article she already used for the ocassion she planned to attend with it. However, the cashier plays his/her part with the story because there is no evidence of refusal coming from what Michelle intends to do.
The correct answer is: "If we remembered everything, we should on most occasions be as ill off as if we remembered nothing". This fact can be seen in the case of Russian journalist S, who forgot very little but, because of this ability, had difficulty with <em>abstract</em> thinking.
Abstract thinking is defined as the capacity of to think about ideas, facts, objects, thoughts, and principles that are not physical. Theses ideas are abstract because they escape the concept of "here and now" and take thinking to a deeper more symbolic level.
