Answer:
on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Explanation:
Both Brown V. Board of Education and parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle presented their case on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled that 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and that the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. It further ruled out that these unequal provisions violated the equal protection laws.
Similarly, the parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued that racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Though the initial plan of the racial tiebreaker system was to prevent racial imbalance in schools, the court adjudged that the system was unconstitutional because it, more or less, contributed to unequal opportunity in getting admissions.
Answer:
Everyday experiences
Explanation:
Ideas from research could come from different variety of sources.
Ideas from everyday experiences refers to a form of ideas that arrive through the daily observation that we made from normal occurrences or phenomenon that we encounter on day to day basis.
In terms of validity, ideas from everyday experiences is not more or less relevant compared to other sources. But the sample group to conduct this type of research tend to be easier to collect compared to other types of researches that needed specific type of subjects.
