Answer:
D. Kurt’s division is less risky than the other divisions.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the most likely reason is that Kurt’s division is less risky than the other divisions. Just as the saying goes "the greater the risk, the greater the reward", the same goes for the opposite, the lower the risk that a division has to undertake the lower the percent for the required return.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The correct answer is I, II, III, and IV
The reason behind is that joint cost is always related to the multifarious products. Joint expense is the assembling cost brought about on a joint creation process which takes regular sources of info however at the same time delivers various items called joint-items, for example, preparing of raw petroleum at the same time yields gas, diesel, stream fuel, greases and different items.
So, as to apportion expenses to such joint items, bookkeepers need to utilize an appropriate cost portion technique on a predictable premise. The joint cost alludes to that cost which is brought about before the split-off point on the creation or assembling of numerous items, by expending similar data sources or factors of creation.
I think it is because it is very hard to do
