<span>The name of the poem became a nominal designation of the mission of the imperialists in the colonial possessions.
Kipling depicts the non-European peoples of them as underdeveloped, dangerous and demanding constant control and assistance from the "white nations". In this regard, the text was often viewed as racist and pro-European-chauvinistic, as a cover for colonial policy, primarily by Britain, justifying its capture in Asia and Africa by humanistic considerations.</span>
Yes,
oligarchy fits as a description of South African government under the system of apartheid. In the
political philosophy of Aristotle, "
aristocracy" is "rule by the excellent ones," and in certain eras of history or in some societies, one group or another has been portrayed as more "excellent" and thus more favorable for serving as governors. In Aristotle's political thought, an
"oligarchy" or "rule by a few" is a corruption of the idea of aristocracy. But Aristotle was biased, believing that by nature some persons are more excellent than others, that some are more suited by nature to be followers, not leaders. (Aristotle used such logic in defending the institution of slavery, for instance.) Today,
we might argue that any sort of "aristocracy" or elitism is always an oligarchy, an arbitrary system in which a few dominate over the many because of factors that can't rationally be defended.For another answer on a similar question, read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9475348#readmore
Answer:
Reynolds v Sims and Baker v Carr, I think.
Explanation:
Hope this helped!
-ROsemaryAndStars
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Luxembourg is a country with less than 1 million residents
Answer:
Plessy vs Ferguson
Explanation:
This case made it that segregation was legal, when Plessy lost his case. It stated, “separate but equal”.
The laws regarding the segregation were called Jim Crow laws. It enforced racial segregation until 1965.
