Answer:
There will be <em>no depreciation (shift)</em> <em>because</em> it is not an open market FX floating rate exchange
Explanation:
All over the world, some countries operate <em>floating rate exchange policy</em> in which the value of <em>a currency increases or decreases based on demand and supply in the forex market.</em>
In the case of <em>Central African CFA</em> (XAF), there would <em>not be a shift in the value of the currency in the FX market as a result of the currency value being controlled rigidly (Non-floating rate exchange method) irrespective of the political scandal in some areas of the region or not. </em>This is also similar to the situation where by a country in the CFA region still has a <em>stable currency exchange rate against Euro irrespective of the terrorism activities or economic situation they are passing through at that particular point in time.</em>
<h2><u>the</u><u> </u><u>function</u><u>s</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>sos</u><u> </u><u>are</u><u>:</u></h2><h2><u>1</u><u>.</u><u>to</u><u> </u><u>help</u><u> </u><u>peop</u><u>le</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>their</u><u> </u><u>need</u><u>.</u></h2><h2><u>2</u><u>.</u><u>To</u><u> </u><u>save</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>life</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>people</u><u>.</u></h2>
<u> </u><u> </u><u> </u><u> </u>
The proper answer in your case is D ok by
Utilitarianism and consequentialism more broadly are ethical theories that __________. have few concrete applications, have almost no critics or challengers, use outdated forms of reasoning
The answer is not supplied in the choices you gave. The answer is "have many variations". Utilitarianism and consequentialism more broadly are ethical theories that have many variations.
