Keenan is buying tires. Keenan has to spend 2 dollars for each tire purchased

TIME REMAINING

erik [133]

Answer:

$1,131.20 is the amount earned

Step-by-step explanation:

Key skills needed: Simple Interest Formula, Operations ( +, - , x , / )

1) To understand this problem, you need to know the simple interest formula.

A = P(1+rt)

A is the amount

P is the principal

R is the interest rate as a decimal

T is the time in years

2) The 1st thing we need to do is convert the interest rate into a decimal. We have 14%. To convert into decimal form, we divide it by a 100, or move the decimal 2 places to the left. This is 0.14 --> So r=0.14

3) Next we use the formula:

A = 1,010(1+ 0.14(8))

We first do 0.14(8) which is 1.12 and then add it to the 1 value, so you will get --> A = 1,010(2.12)
Multiply and you will get A = $2,141.20
To find the interest earned, you subtract this by the original amount, so $2,141.20 - $1,010 which would be $1,131.20

This means $1,131.20 is your answer.

Hope you understood and have a nice day!! :D

8 0

2 years ago

3. For the following geometric sequence, determine a1 and r and find an explicit formula for the sequence: 2, -6, 18, -54…

Vilka [71]

Step-by-step explanation:

a1 is the first term. In this case, 2.

r is the common ratio. Each term is multiplied by -3 to get the next term, so r = -3.

an = 2 (-3)ⁿ⁻¹

4 0

3 years ago

Suppose it takes 4 hours for a certain strain of bacteria to reproduce by dividing in half. If 70 bacteria are present to begin

Sauron [17]

Answer:

1 day: 4480

2 days: 8960

3 days: 13440

$f^{-1}(x) = \sqrt{\frac{x -4}{4}}$ ---- function inverse

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

$f(x) = 70 \cdot 64x$

Solving (a): The amount present after 1 day.

Here, $x =1$

So:

$f(1) = 70 \cdot 64*1= 4480$

Solving (b): The amount present after 2 days.

Here, $x =2$

So:

$f(2) = 70 \cdot 64*2= 8960$

Solving (c): The amount present after 3 days.

Here, $x = 3$

So:

$f(3) = 70 \cdot 64*2= 13440$

Solving (d): The inverse function of:

$f(x)= 4x^2 + 4$

Replace f(x) with y

$y= 4x^2 + 4$

Swap x and y

$x= 4y^2 + 4$

Rewrite as:

$4y^2 = x -4$

Divide by 4

$y^2 = \frac{x -4}{4}$

Take square roots

$y = \sqrt{\frac{x -4}{4}}$

Replace y with function inverse

$f^{-1}(x) = \sqrt{\frac{x -4}{4}}$

6 0

2 years ago

Tain has a great literary tradition that spans centuries. One might assume, then, that Britons read more than citizens of other

tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} \leq p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} > p_{2}$

$z=3.02$

$p_v =P(Z>3.02)=0.00127$

The p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of Canadians is not significantly higher than the porportions of readers at Britons.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

$X_{1}=0.86*1004$ represent the number of Canadians randomly sampled by Gallup that read at least one book in the past year

$X_{2}=0.81*1009$ represent the number of Britons randomly sampled that read at least one book in the past year

$n_{1}=1004$ sample of Gallup selected

$n_{2}=1009$ sample of Britons selected

$p_{1}=0.86$ represent the proportion of Canadians randomly sampled by Gallup that read at least one book in the past year

$p_{2}=0.81$ represent the proportion of Britons randomly sampled that read at least one book in the past year

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the proportion for men with red/green color blindness is a higher than the rate for women , the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} \leq p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} > p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{0.81+0.86}{2}=0.835$

3) Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.86-0.81}{\sqrt{0.835(1-0.835)(\frac{1}{1004}+\frac{1}{1009})}}=3.02$

4) Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided $\alpha$ , but we can calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a one side test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z>3.02)=0.00127$

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of Canadians is not significantly higher than the porportions of readers at Britons.

5 0

3 years ago

I aint gonna lie this is easy points hehehehe

Minchanka [31]

The answer is 8/125.....

4 0

2 years ago

Keenan is buying tires. Keenan has to spend 2 dollars for each tire purchased ​

Keenan is buying tires. Keenan has to spend 2 dollars for each tire purchased