The question asks, "What is YOUR philosophy?" I can't really tell you what YOU should think ... but I can present for you the ideas of a couple different political philosophers who took opposing stands on the issue.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both English philosophers who wrote during the 17th century.
Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan </em>in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). The people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. That was Hobbes' view.
John Locke famously published <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690. According to Locke's view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed. This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler. Locke repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his <em>First Treatise on Civil Government. </em> In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government, </em> Locke argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting their own life, liberty, and property. Locke always favored the people remaining in charge, and asserted that the people have the power to change their government and remove government leaders if the government is not properly serving the needs and well-being of the people.
As you write your own answer to this question for your class, you will want to decide, perhaps, if you agree more with Hobbes, that security and stability are most important ... or with Locke, that the authority and liberty of the people are always paramount.
There were 4 laws in the Middle Ages
Idkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
The ability to perceive visual depth is related to a similar property known as Retinal Disparity.
Retinal disparity is the reality that the left and right fields of vision offer slightly extraordinary visual pics while focusing on a single object. it's far a sort of binocular visual cue that allows humans to perceive depth and distance.
Retinal disparity marks the difference between the two photographs. because the eyes lie multiple inches apart, their retinas select up barely distinctive photographs of objects. The retinal disparity will increase as the eyes get closer to an item.
As an object's distance from the viewer increases, the dimensions of its image at the retina become smaller. And, generally, in the absence of additional visual cues, large objects are perceived as being nearer than smaller items.
Learn more about Retinal Disparity here brainly.com/question/14830057
#SPJ4
Answer:
Authoritarian parents have may characteristics but we define here two characteristics:
- Authoritarian parents are not responsive but are more demanding from their children: These parents have may rules and regulations in their life. They manage things in a very little manner. These parents apply rules and regulations to their children in every aspect of lives, how they behave etc.
- These parents do not show much warmth and nurture to the children: These parents seem very cold and very harsh to the children. These types of parents always yelling at their children rather than encouraging them.
