With respect to moral leadership, the problem in the widespread electric-powered case can fine be characterized as The leadership style of the executives.
Outline ethical leadership. show of normatively appropriate behavior thru private actions and interpersonal relationships, and merchandising of behavior to followers via -way verbal exchange, reinforcement, and selection making.
Leaders who have ethical conduct awareness of having exact communication that is honest and open with every single man or woman of their employer. Manages pressure efficaciously. Leaders and executives are faced with disturbing situations every day, each of their painting's lifestyles and their private existence.
Preserving admiration for others and equally around the team and company is every other example of moral leadership. Egalitarian treatment of their peers is key, there may be no favoritism being performed out and no sick treatment of any member of personnel thru any form of discrimination.
Learn more about ethical leadership here: brainly.com/question/13383200
#SPJ4
Culture-bound syndrome is the name for recurrent, locally specific patterns of aberrant behavior and troubling experience.
<h3>What is culture-bound syndrome?</h3>
Culture-bound syndrome serves as the culture-specific syndrome, which is a combination of psychiatric and somatic symptoms.
Therefore, Culture-bound syndrome are generally limited to specific societies or areas and indicate repetitive sets of symptoms.
Learn more about culture-bound syndrome at;
brainly.com/question/22349601
The best way to illustrate the relative frequency distribution is a percentage or a proportion.
For example, imagine that in the survey conducted above 80 people where interviewed and 35 were democrat, 24 republican, 12 libertarian, and 9 chose another party.
- Absolut frequencies would be the number of responses for each option: 35, 24, 12 and 9.
- Relative frequency (democrats) = 35/80 = 0.4375= 43,75 % of the participants
- Relative frequency (republicans)= 24/80= 0.3 = 30% of the participants
- Relative frequency (libertarians)= 12/80= 0.15 = 15% of the participants
- Relative frequency (others)= 9/80= 0.1125 = 11,25 % of the participants
The <span> governor would be the answer</span>
Answer:
I think answer would be B
