I'd say more likely B. As i've gotten older i've realized the sad truth that a lot of people don't learn from their mistakes. And even if cops were perfect there will still be those few people who decide not to listen.
Answer:
C. kahit anong antas basta magampanan ko ang aking tungkulin mas gusto mapabilang doon. depende po sainyo yung sagot.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Lars is completing a history project about World War I. On the British government's National Archives website, he finds letters from American soldiers as well as documents written by museum curators and historians that give background information about the war, supported by primary sources from their archives' collections.
Which descriptions best characterize this information? Select three options.
a. outdated facts, b. credible sources, c. primary sources, d. biased information
, e. reasoned judgment
Answer:
b. credible sources
c. primary sources
e. reasoned judgment
Explanation:
Primary sources are documents that were made and built at the time the historic event they document is taking place. In that case, they can claim that the letters that American soldiers wrote during the First World War are a primary source.
A credible source is one that is written by an expert on a given subject, in addition, these sources have evidence that supports all the statements they present. When Lars uses historical sources written by curators and historians who used primary sources as evidence, he is using credible feints.
After doing this research, Lars will be able to draw conclusions about the first world war using these sources as evidence, thus making an easoned judgment.
Answer: It portrayed the importance of unification to the colonies. Colonists later repurposed it as a symbol of their rule against British rule
Answer:
They were primarily used as weapons for hunting, spear fishing, and self defense from both animals and humans when needed.
