Answer: Interpleader
Explanation:
The broker just engaged in an Interpleader action which is an action that allows a person who does not own a certain property to get the claimants to the property to go to court for it. The Court will then decide who should get the property after proceedings.
The Broker does not own the deposit but seeing as he did not want to get into trouble with either the Seller or the Buyer, he put the deposit with the courts so that they would decide who owns the deposit.
Answer:
In employment law, a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) (US) or bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR) (Canada) or genuine occupational qualification (GOQ) (UK) is a quality or an attribute that employers are allowed to consider when making decisions on the hiring and retention of employees—a quality that when considered in other contexts would constitute discrimination and thus be in violation of civil rights employment law. Such qualifications must be listed in the employment offering.[citation needed]
Explanation:
Canada
The law of Canada regarding bona fide occupational requirements was considered in a 1985 Canadian court case involving an employee of the Canadian National Railway, K. S. Bhinder, a Sikh whose religion required that he wear a turban, lost his challenge of the CNR policy that required him to wear a hard hat.[1] In 1990, in deciding another case, the Supreme Court of Canada amended the Bhinder decision: "An employer that has not adopted a policy with respect to accommodation and cannot otherwise satisfy the trier of fact that individual accommodation would result in undue hardship will be required to justify his conduct with respect to the individual complainant. Even then the employer can invoke the BFOQ defence."[2]
United States
In employment discrimination law in the United States, both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act contain a BFOQ defense. The BFOQ provision of Title VII provides that:
[I]t shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to hire and employ employees, for an employment agency to classify, or refer for employment any individual, for a labor organization to classify its membership or to classify or refer for employment any individual, or for an employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining programs to admit or employ any individual in any such program, on the basis of his religion, sex, or national origin in those certain instances where religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise ...[3]
i'm not able to add the balance of the answer so pls go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bona_fide_occupational_qualification
Answer:
both Gladys and Phil
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario both Gladys and Phil are guilty of violating the Fair Housing Law. The Fair Housing law completely outlaws the refusal to sell a house or property to someone on the basis of race, color, disability, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin. Which is exactly why Gladys and Phil removed the property and did not want to sell to the minority couple.
Answer:
She never encoded the names into long-term memory is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The type of listing agreement that provides for payment of a commission to the broker even though the owner makes the sale without the broker's aid is called an exclusive right to sell a listing.
Listing of exclusive distribution rights
Listing of exclusive distribution rights is the most commonly used contract. In this type of listing agreement, an agent is appointed as the sole agent of the seller and has exclusive authority to represent the property.
A California Realtor Listing Agreement is an agreement that authorizes a broker to sell an owner's property on their behalf. The contract allows them to list the property, but in most cases gives them exclusive rights to the property transaction and potentially earnable commissions.
Learn more about listing agreement here: brainly.com/question/8186569
#SPJ4