The reason why consumers leave without being served because the consumers must have felt mad or upset about the service being served to them-- causing them to leave their orders or to even wait for their time for their turn of having to get their menu taken.
It is from my experience since if it is from his experience then the author could tell us something like it is a beautiful place or it is very warm. based on these statements it is opinions since he doesn't have a fact do back it up. his experience tells us what he thought so it is his opinion
<span>A.
constructive direction.</span>
Answer:
Yes, Hazel needs to pay extra $700
Explanation:
As per pre-existing duty rule, a person is obligated to perform his duty at the consideration agreed upon initially. Any modification to the contract is void.
Exceptions to this rule:
- As per new contract, if the person undertaking his duty hires another person to perform the work so as to complete it in time, then modifications are valid and enforceable.
- Modifications are valid in case of unforeseen contingencies like war, recession, change in economic conditions and strikes.
In this case, Hazel agreed to pay $700 extra. Under pre-existing duty rule, she is not required to pay Eugene extra $700 but since Eugene took additional help exception to the rule applies and Hazel is obligated to pay $700 extra.
