Free Speech Movement, the National Organization for Women, and the American Indian Movement were all the civil rights movements that are influenced by the strategies of the civil rights activist.
<h3>
What is the meaning of civil rights?</h3>
Civil rights mean providing an equal and fair opportunity to all individuals living in the country under the law irrespective of any caste, creed, or religion.
FSM movement led by Mario Savio against the political activity restrictions of Berkeley.
NOW was established by an American activist for providing equal and fair treatment to women.
AIM was initiated to fight for the Native Americans against the police brutality, poverty, and discrimination among them.
These all are the civil rights movement or organization that was started by the civil rights activist based on their own strategies.
Therefore, the civil rights movement or organization was influenced by the tactics of the civil rights activist.
Learn more about the civil rights movement in the related link:
brainly.com/question/1600185
#SPJ1
Answer:
challenge students to think for themselves.
help students to organize and structure their thoughts and ideas,
encourage students to vocalize and discuss their views and understandings.
design learning activities and tasks that require students to actively engage.
Answer:
It was an important military strategy to control the Hudson river.
Explanation:
British Army wanted to divide rest of the states from New England. It would isolate New England this way.
New England was the center of the rebellion. Three British armies marched from "New York City, Montreal and Fort Oswego" and met in Albany. Then they seized Hudson River. It formed a natural obstruction along the western side of New England. The British were then able to move South and defeat the Southern colonies.
Thus, it was a very important and good military strategy.
The Boll Weevil was an insect that destroyed crops in Alabama in Georgia. The reason they were effect at different times is because they had different crops and the Boll Weevil migrated at different times.
He discussed for democracy, but not for freedom, appealing
that anyone who differs with the general will should be involuntary to monitor
it. He appears to be supporting something like an "absolute
democracy" with complete civil equality, a factual democracy before a
republic, and he openly says that political parties would weaken or disintegrate
a political system founded on the general will.
A dictatorship crashes with this wholly for the reason that whoever governs
the country is not governmentally equal with the rest of the individuals and
can create an oppression of an individual or party. He is disagreeing for a tyranny of the
majority.
