I believe the answer is: Topical or <span>Chronological order.
Chronological order is the type of arrangement that written in a step-by-step format, where the previous piece of information is crucial for understanding the next piece of information
Topical order is the type of arrangement that written by stating the problem followed by the justifications.</span>
Answer:D. Civil law relates to powers described in the Constitution; military laws relate to people who are in the armed forces.
Explanation: Because think of your rights which is in the constitution and with the armed force they have their ruled and rights since they're fighting for something
The correct answer is C. Citizens elect representatives who vote on their behalf to make policy.
Explanation:
In politics, a democracy is a type of government in which the citizens own the power to make decisions related to the government. Additionally, democracies are classified as direct or true democracies if people owned the power and directly take the decisions or as representative democracies if people vote to elect representatives that take the decisions in behalf of all citizens. This implies, in nations such as the United States and many other in which there are representatives such as mayors, vice-president, president, senators, etc. who take the decisions in behalf of all the citizens the democracy is representative rather than true or direct democracy. Therefore, the reason why the United States is not a true democracy is that citizens elect representatives who vote on their behalf to make policy.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Argue a case for appointing judges and then argue a case for having them elected.
In the case of appointing judges, many experts agree on the idea that appointed is better because judges have to be neutral. They serve the Constitution, they do not serve any political party or particular interests.
Once appointed, the judges are going to ratify, so it is supposed that their integrity is double-checked.
In other cases, some arguments favor the election of judges, stating that people should be trusted to elect judges. Through this election, judges will be driven to serve the people who put their trust in them to impart justice.
If they are elected, some voices agree that judges should be elected for a determined period, so people could evaluate if they did a good during their tenure.
However, in both cases, some advantages and disadvantages have to be resolved by law experts and politicians in their respective states.
