1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna35 [415]
2 years ago
7

Hey how does marriage work in relation to law JONA????

Law
1 answer:
My name is Ann [436]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I dont know

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which branch of the federal has the power to appoint federal judges?
user100 [1]

Answer:

The correct answer is Executive Branch .

Explanation:

The executive branch is made up of the president, vice president, and his entire cabinet. For the appointment of a federal judge, the appointment of the President and an approval of the Senate are required considering the provisions of Article 3 of the Constitution of the United States. The duration of this appointment is indefinite, unless the judge commits a crime and must be tried for it.

3 0
2 years ago
If you were a member of the Supreme Court what law would you rule as unconstitutional? What basis would you use to support your
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

Explanation:

The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.

However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.

When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.

Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).

7 0
3 years ago
Jesse james, a 20-year old, was arrested for killing a police officer. As a newly elected prosecutor, you are responsible for pr
Nana76 [90]

It is important to note that various states use various metrics. In general, states adhere to some form of the federal procedural norms. States do have the freedom to take risks in the sake of justice.

<h3>What are federal procedural norms?</h3>

Civil process in United States district courts is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Rules Enabling Act requires the United States Supreme Court to promulgate the FRCP, after which the United States Congress has seven months to veto the rules or they become part of the FRCP.

<h3>Further overview on the above legal situation is as follows:</h3>

At the first stage of the "trial," the defendant must submit a plea. This is frequently followed by a first appearance or preliminary hearing, which may involve a plea if evidence is discovered.

If there are compelling reasons to proceed, a grand jury will be formed to conduct more investigations.

A grand jury must provide evidence that justifies a capital murder trial. The district attorney's office has the same authority. The defendant is then asked if he understands the charge at a pre-trial arraignment.

A plea can also be entered here at times. If the evidence merits it, a formal writ will be sent to the court, signaling the start of a trial.

Following that, pre-trial hearings are held, and witnesses may be questioned. If the defendant claims to have an alibi, he must normally produce documentation. He must describe in full where and when he was when he was exonerated from the crime.

A mental examination may be conducted in some circumstances, particularly in capital trials. There may be a demand that multiple-count trials be heard separately in order to avoid biasing the jury (guilty of the first, more likely that he is guilty of the second).

Deposits can then be made. These are largely out-of-court testimony from witnesses that will serve as the foundation for the defense or prosecution when the trial begins.

Depending on the stage, either of these processes can be considered part of the discovery process. The defendant's record is disclosed at this point, and specific objects of evidence are given over for the defendant's comprehension.

The "Pre-Trial Conference," a relatively new federal rule, is convened to agree on specific criteria throughout the trial. The goal is to speed up the trial and streamline the procedure in general.

The defendant might then request that the case be transferred to another jurisdiction.

Learn more about justice:
brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Why do you make it where we have to pay
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

What do you mean.

It is because we consider things to be owned by each person instead of belonging to nobody. If you want something you have not produced, and which has not been given to you, you must pay for it. The only other way to get it would be to steal it, which is the other system. That is why we have to pay for things.

5 0
2 years ago
Write a brief paragraph summarizing the civil rights guaranteed by each amendment, a list of 3-5 situations in which a police of
madreJ [45]

this isn't an answer!

um hey ill do this for you but um your going to have to give more then 5 points lol your asking for a paragraph about every single amendment in the  constitution and a list of situations a police officer would need knowledge of each amendment to do his or her job properly... and a another paragraph describing why this amendment is important to police work

that will take at least 1 hour so chile um anywayssss 5 points for that? honey noo

20 points and brainlest and its done

psa:

*don't come at me bruh this is a public forum and im just stating my opinion

*please treat people with kindness, wear a mask, and have a lovely day.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need help writing a 200 word juvenile court essay, pls help :)
    14·1 answer
  • When the Supreme Court determines the constitutionality of a law, it is using
    11·1 answer
  • Examples of social contract
    8·2 answers
  • Which aspect of U.S. politics is most closely tied to the concept of indirect
    15·2 answers
  • Opponents of the surveillance allowed under Title II of the Patriot Act argue that _____.
    11·2 answers
  • Yeah. Yeah<br> Just space<br> ajdkasdksfakjhdsfjkh
    6·2 answers
  • Which of these is an economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law?
    15·2 answers
  • Test question test question
    13·1 answer
  • Consumer protection laws, which commonly regulate the form of consumer contracts, provide that back-page disclaimers are void if
    12·1 answer
  • How many illegal immigrants came to the u. S. In 2022.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!