Answer:
ΔRHS ≅ ΔNKW
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that, in the triangles RHS and NKW.
∠H = ∠K
Side HS = KW.
∠S = ∠W
Now, using the ASA congruence criteria, which states that when two corresponding angles of the triangles are equal with the included side between them is equal, then both the triangles are congruent.
Hence, according to ASA criteria, ΔRHS ≅ ΔNKW.
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
the explanation is there :)
hope this helps <3
Answer:
a. The null and alternative hypothesis can be written as:

b. A Type I error is made when a true null hypothesis is rejected. In this case, it would happen if it is concluded that the actual mean outstanding credit card debt of college undergraduate is significantly less than $3173, when in fact it does not.
A Type II error is made when a false null hypothesis is failed to be rejected. In this case, the actual mean outstanding credit card debt of college undergraduate is in fact less than $3173, but the test concludes there is no enough evidence to claim that.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have a prior study of the mean outstanding credit card debt of college undergraduate that states that it was $3173 in 2010.
A researcher believes that this amount has decreased since then.
Then, he has to perform a hypothesis test where the null hypothesis states that the mean is still $3173 and an alternative hypothesis that states that the actual credit card debt is significantly smaller than $3173.
The null and alternative hypothesis can be written as:

3/2x-4=20
We simplify the equation to the form, which is simple to understand
3/2x-4=20
We move all terms containing x to the left and all other terms to the right.
+2x=+20+4
We simplify left and right side of the equation.
+2x=+24
We divide both sides of the equation by 2 to get x.
x=12
Part 1: 52 degrees Fahrenheit
Part 2: 29 degrees Fahrenheit