Answer:
Yes, these facts are valid against Hannah which comes under Ratification Doctrine.
Explanation:
Here in the question its given that Hannah had allowed her friend to lend her computer for a one week period which was during her thanks giving break.
During those times Carol sold that laptop to a friend which was one of them in their class without asking hannah about this.
Now when after the break hannah and carol both return then carol told her that she had sold her laptop because she was getting an amount from the buyer which was too good to pass up so shesold it that moment.
Now when she gave that money to Hannah she instead of scolding her thanked her and her expression was seeming to be like she had done an awsome job for her.
So, based on the facts the contract was valid because it came under Ratification Doctrine.
An example of blockbusting is causing panic selling by telling people that value in a neighborhood will decline due to the purchase of homes by minorities.
<h3>What is
blockbusting?</h3>
blockbusting can be regarded as the act of profiteering through inducing property owners to sell hastily which do occur at a loss by appeals to fears of depressed values.
In this case, An example of blockbusting is causing panic selling by telling people that value in a neighborhood will decline due to the purchase of homes by minorities.
Learn more about blockbusting on:
brainly.com/question/24452126
#SPJ1
Answer:
2. grow up in a perfectionistic home with very high expectations.
Explanation:
1- There is no relation with economic conditions
3- There are no relation with how home is flexible
4- If we check where problem comes from and decided that mother can be the reason then even mother has a healthy body we expect person to be normal.
2- Grow up with very perfectionist and expecting lots of issues then anorexia might occur.
Answer:
The answer is: B) Market B
Explanation:
Deadweight loss refers to an economic loss caused by market inefficiencies.
Market inefficiencies occur when supply and demand are not in equilibrium. In market A, the tax will barely affect the equilibrium quantity, so the deadweight loss will not be as large as in market B where the equilibrium quantity will be severely affected.
