The least likely task to be done while the worksheets are
grouped when you have a workbook that contains sales data for different
regional sales representatives of a company, is to make sure that you ungrouped
sheets if ever you want to perform a task on only one worksheet because if you
forget to ungroup sheets you could potentially ruin several worksheets by
overwriting data on all worksheets instead of just the active worksheet.
Answer:
the future value of the cash flow in year 4 is $5,632.73
Explanation:
The computation of the future value of the cash flow in year 4 is as follows:
= $1,075 × (1.08^3) + $1,210 × (1.08^2) + $1,340 × (1.08^1) + $1,420 ×(1.08^0)
= $1,354.19 + $1,411.34 + $1,447.20 + $1,420
= $5,632.73
Hence, the future value of the cash flow in year 4 is $5,632.73
The same is to be considered and relevant
<span>Heidi should inform them that form 13614-C has to be completed before the return can be prepared, the client will then be interviewed by whomever is preparing the return and additional questions would likely be asked, and the client would need to have a quality review done on their taxes by someone other than the person preparing the return.</span>
Answer:
Authorization of transactions:- Because of unclear subjugation, there is a potential risk of entering a money transfer again and again. To minimize this, all workers should adopt the rules for specific purchases, such as maintaining a set pricing list and guarantee a limited error distance.
Explanation:
The following are the risks which currently exist in the Central Production Limited conversion cycle:-
- Lack of a "Maker and Checker" concept:- It is important because it executes the role of a sort account executive to check that the instructions and demands presented are correct and are not replicated. It would be extremely effective that someone in a position of power and authority might supervise certain rates and with certain operations.
- Use of Hard-copies:- The production center supervisor will temporarily suspend the use of such hard copies for each production process. It is not only a resource loss, but risks being lost or duplicated as well. It really would give them a better chance if all online requests could be collected which would be far more effective and could be seen by all stakeholders. It will also lead to better leadership and faster distribution of information.
- Wastage:- Tests should be in place to determine why additional material is needed above the normal volume, and it should be approved by a senior authority to the superintendent of the production line.
- Supply Chain Management:- Interactions between a variety of agencies are too many. Use an ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) device to help in streamlining the entire process flow will serve them well.
Answer:
$300,000
Explanation:
A company is implored to pay punitive damages if it only intentionally discriminated against employees or their federally protected rights.
The punitive charges paid under the Civil Rights Act of 1991 is $50,000 per violation, this covers an employee number of 14 - 100. While companies with over 500 employees are expected to pay $300,000 per violation.
Since Cellant Solar Energy, Inc. is involved in a case of intentional employee discrimination and it has 800 permanent employees working in different departments. The maximum punitive damage that they will have to pay under the Civil Rights Act of 1991 is $300,000.
