Simplify <span>22\times 2<span>22×2</span></span> to <span>44<span>44</span></span>
<span><span>{x}^{4}+44-16x-12<span><span>x<span><span>4</span><span></span></span></span>+44−16x−12</span></span>Collect like terms
<span><span>{x}^{4}+(44-12)-16x<span><span>x<span><span>4</span><span></span></span></span>+(44−12)−16x</span></span> Simplify</span><span><span>{x}^{4}+32-16x<span><span>x<span><span>4</span><span></span></span></span>+32−16x</span></span><span>
</span></span></span>
Yes because each x value differ by 2.5 and each y value also differs at aconstant rat of 1
well, we're assuming all along that Merina owes Bradford $2000, because in the 1st scenario, she was going to pay twice $1000.
on the 2nd scenario, she'll be paying the same $2000 but split 7 months from now and then 7 months later, same 2000 bucks, at which point Bradford applied 8.5% interest.
using those assumptions, since the wording is not quite clear, we can say that Merina is simply paying 2000 bucks plus the 8.5%
Answer:
6 - yup 7 - nope
Step-by-step explanation:
If the triangle satisfies the pythagoreon theorem, then it is a right triangle
so 6 is a yeah
then for 7, the hypotunese always is greater than the legs in a right triangle, so 7 is no
B. Its suggesting something bigger than -5