Answer:
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
Use the formula for compound interest, with <em>semiannual</em> compound interest rate.
![Future\text{ }Value=Deposit\times (1+APR/n)^{(n\times t)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Future%5Ctext%7B%20%7DValue%3DDeposit%5Ctimes%20%281%2BAPR%2Fn%29%5E%7B%28n%5Ctimes%20t%29%7D)
For<em> semiannual </em>compound interest the number of periods, n, in a year is 2.
APR is the annual percentage rate, which is 6% in this problem. So, APR is 6%/2 = 0.06/2 = 0.03
Then, substitute in the formula with:
- Future value: $50,000
- APR/n = 0.03
- n × t = 2 × 8 = 16
![\$50,000=Deposit\times (1+0.03)^{16}\\\\\\Deposit=\$50,000/(1.03)^{16}=\$31,158.35](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%2450%2C000%3DDeposit%5Ctimes%20%281%2B0.03%29%5E%7B16%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5CDeposit%3D%5C%2450%2C000%2F%281.03%29%5E%7B16%7D%3D%5C%2431%2C158.35)
Round to the nearest dollar: $31,158.
A content analysis of an organization's messages, readability studies, and readership surveys are all tools used to conduct a(n) communications audit.
The destiny price represents the anticipated worth of an unmarried quantity, while the prevailing value represents the present day well worth. is the discounted value of a chain of consecutive destiny payments of equal quantity.
The future fee of a single quantity is equal to the quantity we store or make investments nowadays, the present value of an item, and such multiplied by one plus the hobby charge to the nth strength, where n is the range of compounding durations we maintain that precept within the bank or the number of periods that we make investments the money.
Some of the maxima typically used PR gear consist of press releases, information conferences, and publicity. Sponsorships, product placements, and social media additionally generate a number of positive.
Present value = Factor x Accumulated amount
Learn more about readability here:-brainly.com/question/3923453
#SPJ4
If the united states government lowers the income taxes on the wealthiest americans, while decreasing welfare payments to the poorest americans, the result will likely be <u>increase</u><u> in</u>efficiency and in <u>inequality</u> in the united states
<h3>What is equality?</h3>
Equality can be defined as the way in which wealth or income are distributed equally or when their is equal wealth distribution in a society.
If the united state of America intend to reduce the income taxes of the richest people and reducing the poor people welfare payment the outcome of this action is that it will lead to inefficiency while increase equality or reducing inequality.
Therefore the result will likely be <u>increase </u>efficiency and in <u>equality</u> in the united states
Learn more about Equality here: brainly.com/question/1296408
#SPJ1
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
Given details
1. Magna charter needs a plane for a time duration of 7 years, which can be taken on lease or bought from stellar leasing company
2. In the event that Magna charter has purchase the plane, it is qualified for depreciation, depreciation being the expense; it decreases the profit, then by profit amount.
3. Therefore tax savings on depreciation is the amount of cash inflow
4. correspondingly the lease rentals is expensive, consequently reducing the profit, thereby tax amount also.
5. Magna Charter will have to select the option that gives minimal cash out flows.
6. since the cash flows are in separate periods, & they cannot be compared, thus the cashflows are discounting to today's current value.
7. Discounting of Cash flows shall be done at post tax cost of debt, thus discount rate is 8% (10% * (1- 20%)) for Magna & 6% (10% * (1- 40%) ) for Stellar leasing company.
The diagrams in the attached images below explains Magna View point
Answer:
c) this approach is more consistent with cost-volume-profit analysis.
Explanation:
The absorption costs does not separate the fixed costs and variable cost for profit determination.
This hence, is not adequate for internal purposes of as it does not provide management accountants of the changes in fixed and variable costs that arise as a result of changes in levels of sales demand.
Thus this method is not consistent with cost-volume-profit analysis.