Anne borrowed $600 for 1.5 years. The yearly interest rate was 12%. How much interest did she owe at the end of 1.5 years?

Mathematics

2 answers:

tigry1 [53]3 years ago

5 0

600(1.5)(.12)

Multiply them all together...

=$108

She owes $108 in interest at the end of 1.5 years.

navik [9.2K]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The total loan cost formula is

total cost = (r*p*n) / 1- ((1+r)^-n)

r is rate p is principal and n is number of payments

rate is rate / 1,200 therefore r = .01

number of payments = 1.5 * 12 months per year = 18

total cost = (.01 * 600 * 18) / (1 -(1.01)^-18)

total cost = 108 / 0.1639826858

total cost = 658.6061172693

total cost = 658.61

Interest = 58.61

Source: http://www.1728.org/loanfrm4.htm

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Write an expression for the calculation double 2 and then add 5.

Mariana [72]

The expression is (2x2)+5

8 0

3 years ago

Solve: ( 6 1/5+2 1/2) x 0.85

QveST [7]

It's 21.125 hope this works good luck ;)

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The production manager is going to present this information to the company's board of directors. Which graph should the manager

viktelen [127]

To best emphasize the number of defects. Manager should use graph 3 (refer the image shown):

If we talk about graph 1, it can also be used but usually we put the time line on the horizontal axis, for the convenience and the quantity to be measured on the y-axis. In the graph 1, the time is placed on the vertical axis (x-axis) so it would not be a good pick for the manager.

Same is the case with graph 2 again we have time on the vertical axis. So it is not a good idea to with graph 2.

Graph 3 could be the best to emphasize the number of defects because first of all time is placed on the horizontal axis and the quantity to be shown is on the vertical axis. Secondly, the range of the vertical axis is less so it is easy to observe the data set on the graph quite distinctively. Therefore, graph 3 is the best pick.

Graph 4 is placed correctly in terms of vertical and horizontal axes but the range of vertical axis is quite high due to which the dispersion or the display of the data is quite compressed and it gets hard to visualize.