Answer:
Lamination= $50,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Metro Inc. has two production departments:
Lamination and Molding
Three service departments:
Human Resources, Technology Support, and Purchasing.
The $200,000 costs of Human Resources are allocated based on the number of employees in each production department.
The Lamination department has 40 employees.
The Molding department has 120 employees.
Proportion of employees:
Lamination= 40/160= 25%
Molding= 120/160= 75%
Allocation:
Lamination= 200,000*0.25= $50,000
Molding= 200,000*0-75= $150,000
Answer: A. help you understand the potential and the limitations of information technology
Explanation: Helping you understand some, if not all of the potential and limitations of information technology is among the usefulness of technical skills which are skills, abilities, knowledge or expertise that are needed to perform complex tasks, processes or actions that are computational, mechanical, scientific or relating to information technology. Examples include the knowledge of programming languages, mechanical tools, design programs etc.
Answer: b. Yes; No
Explanation:
The Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is simply a non-governmental organization which is private that helps in the creation of accounting reporting standards, for both states in the United States and the local governments.
Under GASB standards, financial information useful for assessing operational accountability is primarily reported in the Government wide financial statements and not the Fund Financial statements.
Answer:
E. The corporate valuation model discounts free cash flows by the required return on equity.
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
