3.75
14.85
0.89
Those are the answers
Answer:
Social Darwinism provided an ideological justification for the social inequalities that capitalism had brought with it: these would result from the hereditary inferiority of the poor and the hereditary excellence of the richer classes, which are best enjoyed under a laissez-faire system. Applied to peoples and races, it became a justification for racism and imperialism.
As can be seen, social Darwinism is a retrograde political and philosophical stance, which considered different ethnic or national groups as different in terms of capacity or development possibilities. Therefore, since this position has been regarded as false, social Darwinism has no justification in our time.
Answer:
I believe the answer should be the first, third, and, last option but don't listen to me it could be wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
I believe the answer is wrong so don't listen to me
Answer:
1 - 1/10
Step-by-step explanation:
As strange as it may seem, the easiest way to answer this question is to calculate the probability of selecting an elephant first and then to subtract this probability from 1:
Adding up the Numbers of animals, we get 12+4+3+11, or 30. The probability of selecting an elephant is thus 3/30, or 1/10.
Thus, the probability of NOT selecting an elephant is 1 - 1/10 (Answer A).
