Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u><em>The complete question is</em></u>
RT and GJ are chords that intersect at point H. If RH = 10 units, HT = 16 units, and GH = 8 units, what is the length of line segment HJ? 18 units 20 units 26 units 28 units
we know that
The <u><em>intersecting chords theorem</em></u> is a statement that describes a relation of the four line segments created by two intersecting chords within a circle. It states that the products of the lengths of the line segments on each chord are equal
so
In this problem
substitute the given values
solve for HJ
Answer:
264
Step-by-step explanation:
do 20 mulitplyed by 30 then subtracted it by 336
The greatest common factor is 2
We first have to look for the largest number that goes into both equations. The factors of 12 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12. None of 3, 4, 6, or 12 go into 26 evenly. So 2 is the largest number you can take out.
With the variables, we take out as many as the lowest number will let us. Since the smallest number of n's is 2 in the second term, we take that many.
Answer:
11.820 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
The mnemonic SOH CAH TOA reminds you that ...
Sin = Opposite/Hypotenuse
The length of the ladder is the hypotenuse of a right triangle with 52° as the base angle. The side opposite is the height up the building where the top of the ladder rests. So, you have the relation ...
sin(52°) = height/(15 ft)
Multiplying by the denominator gives you ...
height = (15 ft)·sin(52°) ≈ 11.820 ft
___
You may need to round this number appropriately.
Answer:
Option A, there is not sufficient sample evidence to conclude that the full-time placement rate is now less than 87% because the p-value is greater than 0.05.
Step-by-step explanation:
Here the Null hypothesis would be
H0: 87% of the graduates find full-time employment in their field within the first year of graduation
H1: Less than 87% of the graduates find full-time employment in their field within the first year of graduation
Here the p values is 0.07.
Since the p value is greater than 0.05, there are not enough evidences to reject the hull hypothesis.
Hence, option A is correct
