Explanation:
Wealth does not equal income, but people often mistakenly think they're the same thing. Wealth is the net worth of a household, whereas income is what's reported on an income tax return. Being rich isn't about how much money you make or spend — it's about how much money you keep.
13 I believe!! Sorry if I’m wrong!!
Answer:
which decision
Explanation:
wheres the question coming from xD
Answer:
The answer is door-in-the-face technique.
Explanation:
This psychological method explains that a person is more likely to comply to a smaller request after a larger one has been turned down.
This behaviour can be explained through social responsibility. The person asked might find himself compromised after declining the first request, and now feels socially obliged to make up for it in a more reasonable way.
Answer:
Inductive
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning creates wide conclusions from certain observations, just as in this case study, the rate of murder. Majorly, there is data (in our case study- This pattern holds true, even when she controls for population differences (so it is not due to more people living in northern cities)), then generalizations are made from the data (from our case study--greater "culture of violence" in the south produces higher murder rates). This is often referred to as inductive logic, according to Utah State University.
"In inductive inference, there is a shift from an actual one to general form. We make many notations, create a pattern, make a conclusion, and create an explanation or a theory," Wassertheil-Smoller told Live Science. "In science, there is a constant interconnection among inductive inference (based on notations) and deductive inference (based on theory), until we arrive in proximity to the 'truth,' by not just approaching but to be able to prove with total certainty."
Another instance of inductive logic is, "when a person pulls out a coin from a bag and it happened to be a penny. On reaching out the second time, the person also picked a penny, and at the third time, a third coin from the bag is also a penny. It will bring the person to make a generalization that all the coins in the bag are pennies."
Even if the entire premises are correct in a statement, inductive reasoning permits for the generalization to be false. Another example "Semai is a grandmother. Semai is bald. Therefore, all grandmothers are bald." The generalization does not comply logically from the statements.
