Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
<span>Lowered cardio-respiratory fitness is one of the best predictors. By not being in shape and having a weakened heart and lungs, one stands less of a chance of surviving issues that arise in these systems. Including a small amount of exercise in one's routine can alleviate many of the risks inherent with this lack of fitness.</span>
Answer:
True
Explanation:
They later evolved to using Bronze in the Bronze Age and Iron in the Iron Age
Answer:
Economic
Explanation:
Alex, one of the proprietors of Atlas Corp. is worried.The stock market was not doing well, unemployment was 10 percent, inflation was on the rise again, and government debt was still increasing. These concerns of Alex are related to the ECONOMIC dimension of the general environment of Atlas Corp.
