False , The information about a particular person that exists on the internet is a result of only a portion of their online activity. Some things does matter or are part of a person’s digital footprint.
A digital footprint – every now and then called a digital shadow or an electronic footprint – refers back to the path of statistics you leave when the use of the internet. It includes web sites you visit, emails you send, and information you put up online.
It's far all the records online about someone this is published through that man or woman or others. The statistics in a digital footprint is regularly completely on line, because it's far archived, or stored completely, in a spread of ways and passed on by means of others.
A virtual identity is the frame of facts about an individual, company or digital tool that exists online. precise identifiers and use styles make it viable to stumble on individuals or their gadgets.
Learn more about Digital footprint here : brainly.com/question/5679893
#SPJ4
The answer is B. judicially review
hope this helped !
Antisocial personality disorder has no sensitive feelings for others. <span>It's also known as deceitful, irresponsible, impulsive and is different from social norms.</span>
<span>Aggressive behavior can be seen on those who have </span><span>conduct disorder.</span><span> Usually brought by problems dealt having with traumatic experiences.</span>
<span>The statement that a speaker who argues that the world's monarch butterfly population is in danger because their numbers have decreased in several locations is reasoning from specific instances is true.
</span><span>In this informative speech, the speaker acts as a teacher. </span>
Answer: True
Explanation: The Supreme Court admitted that it is haphazard to treat similar things differently and that mandatory death penalty statutes eliminated this problem, but also reckless to treat two different things the same way. In essence, to impose the same penalty on all convicted murderers, even though all defendants
are different, is just as capricious as imposing a penalty randomly.
To relieve this problem, some sentencing guidelines became necessary. This gave rise to the guided discretion statutes that set standards for juries and judges to
use when deciding whether to impose the death penalty. The Court reasoned that, guided discretion statutes struck a reasonable balance between giving the jury some discretion and allowing it to consider the defendant's background and character and the circumstances surrounding the crime.
