The ego, as viewed by Freud, is the balancing mechanism in our personality.
The notion that there are multiple aspects to the human mind and personality was perhaps Freud's most influential and enduring thought.
The id, ego, and superego are three elements of the psyche that develop at different times during our lives, according to Freud's personality theory (1923). These are systems, not portions of the brain, or in any way physical.
According to Freud's psychoanalytic theory, The only component of the conscious personality is the ego. It is what the individual is conscious of while considering oneself, and it is what they typically attempt to project toward others.
The ego grows to act as a mediator between the unrealistic id's perceptions and the outside real world. It is a personality trait related to decision-making. The ego should function rationally, while the id should be chaotic and irrational.
Learn more about Freud's psychoanalytic theory here:
brainly.com/question/9617083
#SPJ4
The correct answer here is false.
What is more it is really recommended that you use examples when trying to familiarize your audience with something new. The examples are usually what sticks with people, even before the idea itself. The people usually ask one another what do we call this and that as they remembered what that is just not what the term is.
Answer:b. enlightened self-interest school
Explanation:
Enlightened self-interest can be defined as the ability of understanding and trusting that as we impact other people's lives positives our lives will also be impacted positively to some extent. As the saying which says "what goes around comes around " simple put. Even though our action may be driven by internal desires to acquire personal satisfaction but under the enlightened self-interest we also look for the needs of others to ensure their wellbeing; it is a two way street everyone benefits.
Devoting ourselves to improving other people lives gives us that satisfaction and the drive to keep going.
It is a fulfilling act that leaves an individual content with their lives for having played a role that changes someone else's live for good.
Answer:
In the landmark U.S. v. New York Times case, the Court ruled that the government could not, through "prior restraint," block publication of any material unless it could prove that it would "surely" result in "direct, immediate, and irreparable" harm to the nation.
Answer:
Prisoner Of War...
Explanation:
That is the only thing I could find on it so good luck!
