Explanation:
If richer regions can attract more investment than poorer regions because of their larger ex ante tax bases, then fiscal federalism adversely affects the growth prospects of poorer regions by reducing the resources available for either central or regional governments to fund valuable projects in poorer regions.Often geographical constraints, market imperfections, government policies, a lack of law & order, identity, per capita income and various socio-economic reasons can contribute to regional disparity such that some regions are more backward than other areas falling within the same nation
(hope it helps)
Answer: Inelastic
Explanation:
A good price is inelastic if a change in price leads to a small change in quantity demanded or does not significantly affect demand for the product.
Answer:
In Roman Empire, there a 2 amjor categories of people living in it. The previledged and the poor. The poorer citizens of Roman was unable to afford the food sold in the city hence the need for a subsidized and free alternative to be offered to them.
<em>In order to meet thier demands, the Roman government needs to purchase grains from Egypt because of its cost effectiveness. </em>
<em>Another major reason was on the need to maintain the peace of Rome through offering people access to buy the subsidized grains imported from Egypt.</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is Executive Attention
Explanation:
Executive function is defined as the sub-function of attention which includes processes for monitoring and resolving conflicts that arise among internal processes. It is involved in the regulation of thoughts, emotions and responses. According to researches by McClelland et al (2017) and Schmitt et al (2017), it involves action planning, allocating attention to goals, error detection and compensation, monitoring progress on tasks, and dealing with novel or difficult circumstances.
Answer:
Explanation:
It wasn't exactly disagreeable speech. The Supreme Court wrangled about the place of the American Flag in American life.
The core issue was whether or not desecration of the US flag is protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court's final decision was yes but only by a 5-4 margin.
So in effect disagreeable speech was upheld. Various attempts have been made to make burning of the flag just going a bit too far. All attempts have failed and the right to disagreeable speech has been upheld.