Answer: blacks were slaves
Explanation:
I think they didn’t really have a judgement about who owned the land but had different tribes of different people, the different tribes might’ve had controversy against each other but that isn’t exactly known. Conflicts over the use and ownership of Native lands are not new. Land has been at the center of virtually every significant interaction between Natives and non-Natives since the earliest days of European contact with the indigenous peoples of North America. By the 19th century, federal Indian land policies divided communal lands among individual tribal members in a proposed attempt to make them into farmers. The result instead was that struggling tribes were further dispossessed of their land. In recent decades, tribes, corporations, and the federal government have fought over control of Native land and resources in contentious protests and legal actions, including the Oak Flat, the San Francisco Peaks Controversy, and the Keystone XL pipeline
Answer: although it says it has no founder i think its Gadadhar Chatterji
Explanation:
Freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion
The German military must have made an effort to absolve itself of any possible involvement for the death of the Jews. Because they chose to follow orders and participated in mass extermination Holocaust , it is critical to refute this defense.
The German military contributed to the racial, political, and territorial goals of Nazism during World War II. The idea that the German military, or Wehrmacht, was not complicit in the Holocaust and other atrocities stemming from Nazi genocidal policy remained for a very long time after the war. This assertion is false. The German military took involvement in numerous parts of the Holocaust, including the use of forced labor, the support of Hitler, and the extermination of Jews and other groups that the Nazis targeted.
Learn more about German military here;
brainly.com/question/28008688
#SPJ4
