All categories

2 years ago

Which of these keeps prices below equilibrium? A. Minimum price B. Price floor C. Minimum-wage laws D. Rent-control laws

1 answer:

8 0

The question ask on which of the following choices keeps prices below equilibrium and based on my research and further understanding i came up with an answer of letter D. Rent control laws because they are laws that set a limit on how high rent can be.

You might be interested in

Does geico provide roadside assistance even if you don't have coverage

iVinArrow [24]

No, Geico offers free towing for customers who have the company’s roadside assistance coverage

8 0

2 years ago

uan Pablo and Zak are competitors in a local market. Each is trying to decide if it is better to advertise on TV, on radio, or n

Colt1911 [192]

Answer: Advertise on radio and earn $14,000

Explanation: Dominant strategy may be explained as the tactics or option which works best for a particular firm and seems to give the firm an edge abive other competitors.

Since both are following their dominant strategy, even though advertising on TV seems more lucrative if only one of the advertise, by the time both of them place TV advert, profit falls to $8000. therefore the strategy who gives the highest return when both thread the same advertising path is the radio advert, which gives a return profit of $14,000. Therfore, Uan Pablo should advertise on radio and earn a profit of $14000

6 0

3 years ago

Iaci Company makes two products from a common input. Joint processing costs up to the split-off point total $42,000 a year. The

eimsori [14]

Questions

Iaci Company makes two products from a common input. Joint processing costs up to the split-off point total $42,000 a year. The company allocates these costs to the joint products on the basis of their total sales values at the split-off point. Each product may be sold at the split-off point or processed further. Data concerning these products appear below: Product X Product Y Total Allocated joint processing costs $22,400 $19,600 $42,000 Sales value at split-off point $32,000 $28,000 $60,000 Costs of further processing $11,600 $25,300 $36,900 Sales value after further processing $44,800 $53,200 $98,000 Required: (a) What is the net monetary advantage (disadvantage) of processing Product X beyond the split-off point?

Answer:

Net advantage from further processing $1,200 

Explanation:

A company should process further a product if the additional revenue from the split-off point is greater than than the further processing cost.

Also note that all the joint costs incurred up to the split-off point are irrelevant to the decision to process further any of the .

Net monetary advantage of product X

Sales revenue after the split-off point 44,800

Sales revenue at the split-off point (32,000)

Additional sales revenue 12,800

Further processing cost (11,600)

Net advantage from further processing 1,200

Net advantage from further processing $1,200 

4 0

3 years ago

Bramble Corp. has the following accounts at December 31: Common Stock, $11 par, 5,450 shares issued, $59,950; Paid-in Capital in

bonufazy [111]

Answer:

$127,700

Explanation:

Bramble Corp stockholders’ equity section of the balance sheet

Stockholders’ equity

Paid-in Capital

Capital Stock

Common Stock 59,950

Additional Paid-in Stock

Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par Common Stock 33,400

Total paid in Capital 93,350

Retained Earnings 47,000

Total paid in Capital and Retained Earnings 140,350

(93,350+47,000)

LessTreasury Stock 12,650

Total Stockholders’ equity 127,700

(140,350-12,650)

6 0

3 years ago

The better-off test for evaluating whether a particular diversification move is likely to generate added value for shareholders

Arada [10]

Answer: Has competitively valuable value chain match-ups with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart.

Explanation:

The better-off test of diversification is that the company must gain a return that is higher than incremental growth. Incremental growth is usually defined a 1 + 1 = 2 formula and this test argues that Diversification must provide more than this such that the company achieves synergistic growth ( 1 + 1 = 3) which is what happens when different entities work better together than alone.

Diversification should therefore be into an area that will be able to match-up with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart and produce even greater returns.

5 0

2 years ago