I think that: <span>( At that very moment Ivan Ilyich fell through and caught sight of the light, and it was revealed to him that though his life had not been what it should have been, this could still be rectified.): shows that Ivan Ilyich finally understands the cause of his suffering. I think that because it says "and it was revealed to him that though his life had not been what it should have been, this could still be rectified.", and I think that shows when he realises it.</span>
Answer:
Its B: Then he said again, "I'll be back to check on you. One wrong move and off you go to prison too."
Explanation:
I took the test
Prior restraint, a kind of censorship, allows the government to review the content of printed materials and restrict their distribution.
- Most scholars believe that the First Amendment's guarantee of press freedom includes a prohibition on earlier restraints. The government may put restrictions on speech that make it harder for it to occur or outright prohibit public circulation of media. Prior constraint might be anything as innocent-seeming as a local rule limiting where newspapers can be sold.
- Prior constraint, also known as prior censorship or pre-publication censorship, is restriction of expression that forbids specific forms of expression and is typically applied by a government or organisation.
Thus this is the meaning of prior restraint.
Refer here to learn more about prior restraint: brainly.com/question/1143665
#SPJ4
Answer:
Rhetorical listening offers the 'stance of openness to subsume different perspectives.'
Explanation:
The key difference between the regular and rhetorical listening is that the latter gives us enough broadness to pay attention to opposing views as well. It helps us in moving ahead of our various cultural or other identity-associated barriers and view different frameworks or perspectives. Rhetorical listening takes us to a more ethical and logical while believing in anyone's thoughts or opinions during an argument. Rhetorical listening promotes comprehension and collective knowledge.
She believes they are an imperfect way of understanding a person’s expression.
