Fraud in research can affect other scientific researchers in very big ways. Fraud in scientific research by one scientist could prevent other scientists from doing accurate research on the same subjects after they take the original scientists work as legitimate and accurate. Scientists build off of each others previous work and findings, so if a scientists commits fraud or creates a false body of knowledge it can directly influence other scientists work and prevent them from doing solid, valid scientific research.
The Columbian exchange was a product of European overseas expansion (a series of interactions and adaptations among societies across the Atlantic). Exploration and conquest by the Spanish and Portuguese resulted in extensive fatal epidemics, the creation of racially mixed populations, and the establishment of a caste system.
Spanish settlers had a significant impact on the Western Hemisphere's economic, social, and political growth exchange through the introduction of new crops and cattle. New American crops encouraged population growth in European countries.
The European transition from feudalism to capitalism was made easier by new mineral income exchange sources. The British colonies in North America supplied Europe with raw goods including rice, tobacco, and lumber.
To learn more about European, click here.
brainly.com/question/1683533
#SPJ4
When James Oglethorpe allegedly said he wanted to establish a British colony for the "worthy poor," he was most likely referring to people in debt.
The correct answer is A) Did the researches tried to find any common factor in its subjects that would influence both hours spent sitting and the likelihood of developing diabetes?
The other options of the question are B) Who pay for this research and what possible motivations would they have to skew the results in a way that would benefit them? C) What are the average mortality rates associated with diabetes and does this risk offset the benefits of sitting comfortably at work? D) How did the researchers measure how many hours the subject sits per day and what qualifies as an official diabetes diagnosis?
A new high-profile study reports a strong connection between how long people sit every day and how likely they are to develop diabetes. The question that best represents a critical examination of the research is " Did the researches tried to find any common factor in its subjects that would influence both hours spent sitting and the likelihood of developing diabetes?"
A critical examination is the kind of evaluation approach that uses a systemathic and logical way to understand the phenomenon at study. The issue is studied in a systematic way to analyze the content and the variables in order to find the best alternative for the solution. That is why the question "A" best represents critical examination.
Answer:
c) Polls are the least reliable way to measure opinon
Explanation:
Opinion polls or poll is the term term used to sample the opinion or take survey of a small population from a large population.
The reason opinion polls are not always encouraged or the best form of data collection or research is because the polls are not always reliable.
Most times individual who don't have better knowledge about an issue end up giving an opinion about it.
It uses a subset to determine the opinion of a population.
These reason are why opinion polls are not reliable.
