Answer:
Risky shift.
Explanation:
Risky shift is when a group or team agrees on a decision that would have been riskier for one individual to take alone. Such a group attitude would increase the chance for consequences that are not positive. In such a scenario people would change their decisions to be more riskier when they are in a group compared to when they are acting individually. It is a form of group polarization.
Answer:
A. two; majority of popular vote
Explanation:
This is true in the sense that, Governorship position term limit in the United States is four years per term and can only serve for two terms, making it eight years. This is in some cases within a certain years period of 12 or 16 years.
Also, the governorship election in the United States is a direct election, which means it is based on popular votes.
It depends the goal of the argumentative paper. If you are arguing for a clear purpose use the expert testimony because of its credibility. Although if you are arguing and spitballing around about a topic then use your opinion about it.
<span />
The correct answer would be option C, Cooperate with each other but fail to gain long term benefits.
Explanation:
Social Trap is a concept in psychology, which states that when a group of people act in a way that they obtain the short term goals, but they are unable to get benefit out of it in the long run, then the situation is called as the social trap.
So A social trap is a condition in which individuals cooperate with each other but fail to gain long term benefits.
The most common and simple example of social trap is drinking at parties. Individuals drink together to gain short term goals of pleasure and happiness and being lost in another world which is free of sorrows, but the long term effect of drinking too much is not beneficial at all. It means they gained the short term goal but failed to gain long term benefits.
Learn more about goals at:
brainly.com/question/11895183
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
The Fundamental Orders were adopted by the Connecticut Colony council on January 14, 1639 O.S. (January 24, 1639 N.S.). The fundamental orders describe the government set up by the Connecticut River towns, setting its structure and powers. They wanted the government to have access to the open ocean for trading. Whereas the Mayflower Compact was a general statement in favor of majority rule and government in the interest of the common welfare, the Fundamental Orders set up a detailed scheme of government in which the sovereign power rested with the freemen. No mention was made of the king.
Explanation:
Be safe!!
