All categories

2 years ago

Is it possible to have a high per capita income in a country where many people are poor ?how? explain

Social Studies

2 answers:

antiseptic1488 [7]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Per capita income is national income divided by population size. Per capita income is often used to measure a sector's average income and compare the wealth of different populations. Per capita income is often used to measure a country's standard of living. It is usually expressed in terms of a commonly used international currency such as the euro or United States dollar, and is useful because it is widely known, is easily calculable from readily available gross domestic product (GDP) and population estimates, and produces a useful statistic for comparison of wealth between sovereign territories. This helps to ascertain a country's development status. It is one of the three measures for calculating the Human Development Index of a country. Per capita income is also called average income.

gulaghasi [49]2 years ago

4 0

Like África is a poor country or Romania because they don’t have much nice places to look at and the houses are old and broken and there’s a higher population of poor people.

You might be interested in

Why are vice presidential candidates chosen to balance the ticket?

zaharov [31]

A running mate who can strengthen his chance of being elected by virtue of certain ideological, geographic, racial, ethnic, gender, or other characteristics.

3 0

2 years ago

Difference between sociological imagination and sociological perspective

scoray [572]

Reform social welfare department

6 0

2 years ago

__________means providing opportunities for employees to develop the job-specific skills, experience, and knowledge they need to

Kitty [74]

Answer:

Training

Explanation:

The means of providing opportunities for employees to develop the job-specific skills, experience, and knowledge they need to do their jobs or improve their performance is called training.

Training means giving new or current employees the skills they need to perform their jobs.

6 0

3 years ago

Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost

Natali [406]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

"Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars. Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?

(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically. (B) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased raw material costs for that equipment. (C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants. (D) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants. (E) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become economically viable."

Answer:

Explanation:

Economic viability is able to reveal the degree of acceptance of consumers in relation to a specific product. This viability is important to understand how the product will be received in the market and how profitable or not it can be for those who produce it.

Economic viability is usually greater when the cost and benefit ratio of the product or service is favorable, however this is not always the case.

Regarding the use of solar energy, although technological changes have made the installation and equipment of this type of energy more cost-effective, these technological changes have also increased the efficiency of oil plants. As a result, the economic viability of solar energy has declined.

4 0

2 years ago

While testifying as an eyewitness to a burglary that occurred 11 months ago, Abraham was able to recall with great detail the cr

jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

Craik and Lockhart would say that Abraham must ahve used the deep -or semantic- level of processing while encoding the event.

Explanation:

In 1972, Fergus I. M. Craik and Robert S. Lockhart identified the levels-of-processing effect that makes reference to the memory recall of stimuli in terms of the depth of a mental process.

There are two main levels of processing: shallow processing, which has to do with fragile memory, and deep processing, that involves a more durable memory trace.

Deep processing can occur when the person relates the object or situation to something else, when the meaning of something is thought of or when the person processes the importance of the object or situation. At the same time, deep processing can retain memories by repeting information, by analyzing it in a deeper way or by making distinctions between the items involved. All these elements would be present in Abraham's case.

7 0

3 years ago