Answer: successful in battle
Explanation:
Based on the passage, we can infer that the disinherited knight can be described as a chivalric hero due to the fact that he was successful in battle.
The chivalric hero is a hero who sets out in order to find an adventure. He was successful in battles. Other options given are incorrect as they don't define what a chivalric hero is about.
Bring envied, engaging in trickery, and the flaunting of ones power cannot be considered to be chivalric.
Answer:
Ensure that all air vents in the fireplace are open. Put the logs on the bottom of the fireplace. It is important that the wood is cleft and dry. The logs may be as thick as a fist or thicker.Add a layer of small logs of about 4 cm, and then one or two layers of kindling. Remember that air is important – approx. 1 cm between the pieces of wood is the perfect spacing.Put a couple of fire firelighters on top of the layer of kindling wood or use some newspaper. Be aware that newspaper produces unnecessary amounts of ashes and contributes to more soot.The last step is easy, just light it and close the door! Some chimneys take more time to create good fraught than others. If the fraught is insufficient, it might be an idea to open the door to the wood stove slightly until it is properly burning. If the house or cabin is "too" insulated, you might want to open a window. The same applies if the kitchen ventilator is on OR Tinder is light, dry material like dry moss, straw, tiny twigs, or newspaper that takes a spark. You can also use tinder that has sap in it, such as pieces of bark or pine cones. Tinder catches fire first and burns very quickly. The key is to get enough tinder under the kindling so that the kindling begins to burn.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is: <u>e. appeal to novelty</u>
Explanation:
Basically what the appeal to novelty fallacy is about, it's exactly and literally this statement as the argument is based on something being better than the other because it´s newer. The other options cannot be possible as <em>bandwagon </em>is basically basing your argument on what the other people believe, if the majority believes it's correct, then according to this fallacy, it is correct; <em>false syllogism </em>is an incorrect proposition, which draws the wrong conclusion from two premises; <em>appeal to tradition </em>is that one which is believed to be correct judt because it's the traditional belief; <em>invalid analogy or false analogy </em>consists in assuming that just beacause two things are different in a certain way, then they are different in every aspect.
Answer:
huh?
Explanation:
we need to see the choices bruh I guess
